Literature DB >> 22154510

An ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a novel vertebral compression fracture treatment system to kyphoplasty.

Derek C Wilson1, Ryan J Connolly, Qingan Zhu, Jeff L Emery, Stephen P Kingwell, Scott Kitchel, Peter A Cripton, David R Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fracture repair aims to relieve pain and improve function by restoring vertebral structure and biomechanics, but is still associated with risks arising from polymethylmethacrylate cement extravasation. The Kiva® Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment System, a stacked coil implant made of polyetheretherketone and delivered over a guide-wire, is a novel device designed to provide height restoration and mechanical stabilization, while improving cement containment and minimizing disruption of cancellous bone. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Kiva system is as effective as balloon kyphoplasty at restoring mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS: Wedge fractures were created in the middle vertebra of fourteen osteoporotic three-vertebra spine segments and then repaired with either the Kiva or kyphoplasty procedure. Height, stiffness and displacement under compression of the spine segments were measured for four conditions: intact, fractured, augmented, and post-cyclic eccentric loading (50,000cycles, 200-500N, 30mm anterior lever arm).
FINDINGS: No significant differences were seen between the two procedures for height restoration, stiffness at high or low loads, or displacement under compression. However, the Kiva System required an average of 66% less cement than kyphoplasty to achieve these outcomes (mean 2.6 (SD 0.4) mL v. mean 7.5 (SD 0.8) mL 0; P<0.01). Extravasations and excessive posterior cement flow were also significantly lower with Kiva (0/7 v. 4/7; P<.05).
INTERPRETATION: Kiva exhibits similar biomechanical performance to balloon kyphoplasty, but may reduce the risk of extravasation through the containment mechanism of the implant design and by reducing cement volume.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22154510     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  KIVA VCF system in the treatment of T12 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Olmo Consonni; Francesco Langella; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of the effect of two different bone-targeted radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems alone and in combination with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on the biomechanical stability of the metastatic spine.

Authors:  Padina S Pezeshki; Sean Davidson; Kieran Murphy; Claire McCann; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Michael Sherar; Albert Jm Yee; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Therapeutic Efficacy of Third-Generation Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation System (PVAS) in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCFs): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunke Dong; Yuting Zhu; Jun Zhou; Liang Dong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Can prevention of a reherniation be investigated? Establishment of a herniation model and experiments with an anular closure device.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lena Ressel; Frank Heuer; Nicolas Graf; Stefan Rath
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  The application of fiber-reinforced materials in disc repair.

Authors:  Bao-Qing Pei; Hui Li; Gang Zhu; De-Yu Li; Yu-Bo Fan; Shu-Qin Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sairam Gajavelli; Aaron Gee; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Emil H Schemitsch; Christopher S Bailey; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.