Literature DB >> 22154199

Ulipristal acetate: review of the efficacy and safety of a newly approved agent for emergency contraception.

Ashley R Richardson1, Fraidy N Maltz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency contraception (EC) is used to prevent unintended pregnancies. The current gold standard for oral EC is levonorgestrel (LNG) administered as a single 1.5-mg dose or in 2 doses of 0.75 mg separated by 12 hours. LNG has shown to be effective up to 72 hours after coitus. Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator approved for EC use in the United States in August 2010. UPA is administered as a one-time, 30-mg dose within 120 hours of intercourse.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review was to provide a summary of the available literature on the use of UPA for EC.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EBSCO, and Iowa Drug Information Service were searched from February 2011 through September 2011 to identify relevant articles. Search terms included ulipristal acetate, CDB-2914, VA 2914, and emergency contraception.
RESULTS: In an open-label study, UPA was effective in preventing pregnancy in 1241 women who presented for EC up to 120 hours (5 days) after unprotected intercourse, with an observed pregnancy rate of 2.1% (95% CI, 1.4%-3.1%) versus 5.5% (ie, the expected pregnancy rate without EC). The efficacy of UPA did not decrease significantly (P = 0.44) over time, with pregnancy rates at intervals between >48 and 72 hours at 2.3% (95% CI, 1.4%-3.8%), >72 and 96 hours at 2.1% (95% CI, 1.0%-4.1%), and >96 and 120 hours at 1.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.8%). In a single-blind, comparative noninferiority study of 1696 women, UPA was at least as effective as LNG when used within 72 hours for EC, with 15 pregnancies in the UPA group and 22 pregnancies in the LNG group (odds ratio = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.35-1.31]). In addition, UPA prevented significantly (P = 0.037) more pregnancies than LNG when used between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected intercourse, with 0 pregnancies in the UPA group and 3 pregnancies in the LNG group. In a meta-analysis, UPA prevented a greater percentage of pregnancies than LNG at intervals up to 24 hours (0.9% UPA vs 2.5% LNG; P = 0.035), up to 72 hours (1.4% UPA vs 2.2% LNG; P = 0.046), and up to 120 hours (1.3% UPA vs 2.2% LNG; P = 0.025). The most commonly (>10%) reported adverse events included headache, nausea, and abdominal pain. In addition, UPA delayed onset of menstruation by a mean of 2.1 to 2.8 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical trials, UPA seems to be a reasonably tolerable and effective method of EC when used within 120 hours of intercourse. UPA is at least as effective as LNG when used within the first 72 hours after unprotected intercourse. However, UPA may be more effective than LNG when used between 72 to 120 hours after unprotected intercourse, extending the window of opportunity for EC. UPA may provide a new option for women who require EC up to 5 days after unprotected intercourse.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22154199     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  8 in total

1.  Progesterone Predisposes Females to Obesity-Associated Leptin-Mediated Endothelial Dysfunction via Upregulating Endothelial MR (Mineralocorticoid Receptor) Expression.

Authors:  Jessica L Faulkner; Simone Kennard; Anne-Cecile Huby; Galina Antonova; Qing Lu; Iris Z Jaffe; Vijay S Patel; David J R Fulton; Eric J Belin de Chantemèle
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The Prescription of the Morning-After Pill in a Berlin Emergency Department Over a Four-Year Period - User Profiles and Reasons for Use.

Authors:  M David; A-M Radke; K Pietzner
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Ulipristal blocks ovulation by inhibiting progesterone receptor-dependent pathways intrinsic to the ovary.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Nallasamy; Jaeyeon Kim; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Milan Bagchi; Indrani Bagchi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Waleed M Sweileh; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Samah W Al-Jabi; Ansam F Sawalha
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-05

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacology of Hormonal Emergency Contraceptive Pills.

Authors:  Celia M J Matyanga; Blessing Dzingirai
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2018-10-04

6.  The attitudes of Korean physicians toward emergency contraceptive pills: regarding women's access and rescheduling.

Authors:  Eun Sil Lee; Chong A Lee; Jee Hee Lee; Bo Ra Park; Imsoon Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Changes in use of emergency contraceptive pills in the United States from 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Rubina Hussain; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2021-05-10

8. 

Authors:  Alberto López García-Franco; José Antonio Baeyens Fernández; Emilia Bailón Muñoz; M José Iglesias Piñeiro; Isabel Del Cura González; Amparo Ortega Del Moral; Jacinta Landa Goñi; Pablo Alonso Coello; Lorenzo Arribas Mir
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.137

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.