Literature DB >> 22153550

Neurocognitive function in destination therapy patients receiving continuous-flow vs pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device support.

Ralph J Petrucci1, Joseph G Rogers, Laura Blue, Colleen Gallagher, Stuart D Russell, Dzifa Dordunoo, Brian E Jaski, Suzanne Chillcott, Benjamin Sun, Tammy L Yanssens, Antone Tatooles, Lalig Koundakjian, David J Farrar, Mark S Slaughter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) improved survival in destination therapy (DT) patients during a randomized trial compared with pulsatile-flow LVADs. This study documented changes in cognitive performance in DT patients from that trial to determine if there were differences between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow support.
METHODS: Data were collected in a sub-study from 96 HeartMate II continuous-flow and 30 HeartMate XVE pulsatile-flow LVAD patients from 12 of the 35 trial sites that followed the same serial neurocognitive (NC) testing protocol at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after LVAD implantation. Spatial perception, memory, language, executive functions, and processing speed were the domains assessed with 10 standard cognitive measures. Differences over time and between LVAD type were evaluated with linear mixed-effects modeling.
RESULTS: From 1 to 24 months after LVAD implantation, changes in NC functions were stable or showed improvement in all domains, and there were no differences between the continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow groups. Data at 24 months were only available from patients with the continuous-flow LVAD due to the limited durability of the HeartMate XVE device. There was no decline in any NC domain over the time of LVAD support. Missing data not collected from patients who died could have resulted in a bias toward inflated study results.
CONCLUSIONS: The NC performance of advanced heart failure patients supported with continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow LVADs shows stabilization or improvement during support for up to 24 months.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22153550     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  8 in total

1.  Does cognition improve following LVAD implantation?

Authors:  Marykay A Pavol; Joshua Z Willey; Ying Wei; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Randolph S Marshall; Philip J Marascalco; Jason Harwood; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-23

2.  The heart-brain connection: mechanistic insights and models.

Authors:  K Ritz; M A van Buchem; M J Daemen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Incidence and predictors of cognitive decline in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Timothy J Fendler; John A Spertus; Kensey L Gosch; Philip G Jones; Jared M Bruce; Michael E Nassif; Kelsey M Flint; Shannon M Dunlay; Larry A Allen; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-04-29

4.  Clinical psychological and neuropsychological issues with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).

Authors:  Daniela Mapelli; Annachiara Cavazzana; Chiara Cavalli; Tomaso Bottio; Vincenzo Tarzia; Gino Gerosa; Bianca Rosa Volpe
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Kate H Magid; Amrut V Ambardekar; Jocelyn S Thompson; Daniel D Matlock; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-02-08

7.  Neuropsychological Assessment and Screening in Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eric J Connors; Alexander O Hauson; Brianna D Barlet; Sharis Sarkissians; Nicholas P Stelmach; Alyssa D Walker; Natasha M Nemanim; Kristina L Greenwood; Nicholas J Chesher; Scott C Wollman; Kenneth E Allen; Matthew G Hall; Christopher Flora-Tostado
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  NT-proBNP and Risk of Dementia in a General Japanese Elderly Population: The Hisayama Study.

Authors:  Takuya Nagata; Tomoyuki Ohara; Jun Hata; Satoko Sakata; Yoshihiko Furuta; Daigo Yoshida; Takanori Honda; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Tomomi Ide; Shigenobu Kanba; Takanari Kitazono; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Toshiharu Ninomiya
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.