Literature DB >> 22153395

Anchored versus conventional hang-back bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for exotropia.

Reza Nabie1, Minoo Azadeh, Dima Andalib, Farzin Soltan Mohammadlou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the results of conventional hang-back and anchored hang-back technique for bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions in patients with exotropia.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomized clinical study, 60 patients underwent lateral rectus muscle recession by either conventional hang-back or anchored hang-back technique. Patients were then followed for 6 months; postoperative deviation and complications were compared. Surgery was considered successful if the postoperative deviation was within 10(Δ) of orthophoria.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 14.2 ± 10.3 years (median, 12 years) in the conventional hang-back group and 11.5 ± 9.3 years (median, 8 years) in anchored group (P = 0.85). The mean preoperative deviation at distance and near between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. The mean postoperative deviation was 8(Δ) ± 9(Δ) at distance and 7(Δ) ± 9(Δ) at near in the conventional group and 9(Δ) ± 8(Δ) at distance and 8(Δ) ± 8(Δ) at near in the anchored group. (P = 0.48 for distance, P = 0.98 for near). After 6 months, 63% of the conventional group and 60% of the anchored group were within 10(Δ) of orthophoria. Complications such as globe perforation, A and V patterns, and vertical deviations did not occur in either group. There were no statistically significant differences in the success rates (P = 0.79) or complications between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The placement of additional posterior scleral sutures to "anchor" the insertion did not improve outcomes in lateral rectus muscle recession surgery.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22153395     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  2 in total

1.  Modified adjustable suture hang-back recession: Description of technique and comparison with conventional adjustable hang-back recession.

Authors:  Siddharth Agrawal; Vinita Singh; Ankur Yadav; Sonal Bangwal; Vishal Katiyar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 2.  Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures.

Authors:  Samia Al Jabri; Jamie Kirkham; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.