Literature DB >> 22153324

The ability of children to delay gratification in an exchange task.

Sophie Steelandt1, Bernard Thierry, Marie-Hélène Broihanne, Valérie Dufour.   

Abstract

The ability to wait for a reward is a necessary capacity for economic transactions. This study is an age-related investigation of children's ability to delay gratification in an exchange task requiring them to wait for a significant reward. We gave 252 children aged 2-4 a small piece of cookie, then offered them an opportunity to wait for a predetermined delay period before exchanging it for a larger one. In a first experiment, the children had to exchange the initial food item for rewards two, four or eight times larger. Results showed that children aged 3-4 years old sustained longer time lags for larger rewards than for smaller rewards. This effect was not found in 2-year-old subjects. In a second experiment, a reward 40 times larger than the initial piece was offered to determine the maximum waiting time that children could sustain. All age groups increased their performances. Older children were more successful at waiting, but some children as young as 2 years old were able to tolerate delays of up to 16 min. Older children who chose to give up waiting earlier than their known capacity demonstrated anticipation skills which had not been seen in younger children, showing that they had anticipated an increase in the time lag, and that they had considered both time and reward value when making their decision. Despite the age effect, we did not establish any limits for delaying gratification in children. This study may have educational implications for dealing with behavioral misconduct, which is known to be related to impulsivity control in young children.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22153324     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mattea S Rossettie; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Waiting for better, not for more: corvids respond to quality in two delay maintenance tasks.

Authors:  Friederike Hillemann; Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal; Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Children base their investment on calculated pay-off.

Authors:  Sophie Steelandt; Valérie Dufour; Marie-Hélène Broihanne; Bernard Thierry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Carrion crows cannot overcome impulsive choice in a quantitative exchange task.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Valerie Dufour; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-17

5.  Reward type and behavioural patterns predict dogs' success in a delay of gratification paradigm.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Matteo Soliani; Friederike Range; Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Markus Boeckle; Sarah A Jelbert; Anna Frohnwieser; Claudia A F Wascher; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-20

7.  Delayed gratification in New Caledonian crows and young children: influence of reward type and visibility.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Anna Frohnwieser; Martina Schiestl; Dakota E McCoy; Russell D Gray; Alex H Taylor; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.899

8.  Intra- and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Matthew Petelle; Cecilia Baldoni; Anastasia Krasheninnikova; Eleonora Rovegno; Auguste M P von Bayern
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.899

9.  Decision-making under risk of loss in children.

Authors:  Sophie Steelandt; Marie-Hélène Broihanne; Amélie Romain; Bernard Thierry; Valérie Dufour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?

Authors:  Friederike Range; Désirée Brucks; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.