BACKGROUND: While warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurs in 0.25%-1.1% patients per year, little is known about the practice and outcomes of anticoagulant reinitiation. METHODS: We studied a cohort of consecutive patients with warfarin-related ICH (intracerebral or subarachnoid) admitted to 13 stroke centres in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network between July 2003 and March 2008. We examined patterns of warfarin reinitiation and variables associated with 30-day and 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 284 patients studied (mean age 74 ± 12 years), warfarin was restarted in-hospital in 91 patients (32%). Factors associated with restarting warfarin were lower stroke severity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.20-3.57, P = 0.009) or presence of valve prosthesis (aOR 3.07, 95% CI; 1.29-7.27, P = 0.011). Mortality rates were not higher in those who restarted warfarin in-hospital: 31.9% vs 54.4% (30-day, P < 0.001) and 48% vs 61% (1-year, P = 0.04), and bleeding was not increased. Multivariable predictors of mortality included initial international normalized ratio > 3.0 (aOR, 3.28 [30-day, P < 0.001] and 3.32 [1-year, P = 0.003]), greater stroke severity (aOR, 6.04 [30-day] and 4.22 [1-year]; both P < 0.001), and intraventricular hemorrhage (aOR, 2.19 [30-day; P = 0.03] and 2.04 [1-year; P = 0.04]). In selected patients who reinitiated warfarin, there was no increase in 30-day (aOR, 0.49; P = 0.03) or 1-year mortality (aOR, 0.79; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients at high thrombosis risk, reinitiation of warfarin after ICH did not confer increased mortality or bleeding events.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: While warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurs in 0.25%-1.1% patients per year, little is known about the practice and outcomes of anticoagulant reinitiation. METHODS: We studied a cohort of consecutive patients with warfarin-related ICH (intracerebral or subarachnoid) admitted to 13 stroke centres in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network between July 2003 and March 2008. We examined patterns of warfarin reinitiation and variables associated with 30-day and 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 284 patients studied (mean age 74 ± 12 years), warfarin was restarted in-hospital in 91 patients (32%). Factors associated with restarting warfarin were lower stroke severity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.20-3.57, P = 0.009) or presence of valve prosthesis (aOR 3.07, 95% CI; 1.29-7.27, P = 0.011). Mortality rates were not higher in those who restarted warfarin in-hospital: 31.9% vs 54.4% (30-day, P < 0.001) and 48% vs 61% (1-year, P = 0.04), and bleeding was not increased. Multivariable predictors of mortality included initial international normalized ratio > 3.0 (aOR, 3.28 [30-day, P < 0.001] and 3.32 [1-year, P = 0.003]), greater stroke severity (aOR, 6.04 [30-day] and 4.22 [1-year]; both P < 0.001), and intraventricular hemorrhage (aOR, 2.19 [30-day; P = 0.03] and 2.04 [1-year; P = 0.04]). In selected patients who reinitiated warfarin, there was no increase in 30-day (aOR, 0.49; P = 0.03) or 1-year mortality (aOR, 0.79; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients at high thrombosis risk, reinitiation of warfarin after ICH did not confer increased mortality or bleeding events.
Authors: Santosh B Murthy; Ajay Gupta; Alexander E Merkler; Babak B Navi; Pitchaiah Mandava; Costantino Iadecola; Kevin N Sheth; Daniel F Hanley; Wendy C Ziai; Hooman Kamel Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-11-27
Authors: Gustavo Zapata-Wainberg; Sonia Quintas; Álvaro Ximénez-Carrillo Rico; Jaime Masjuán Vallejo; Pere Cardona; Mar Castellanos Rodrigo; Lorena Benavente Fernández; Andrés García Pastor; José Egido; José Maciñeiras; Joaquín Serena; María Del Mar Freijo Guerrero; Francisco Moniche; José Vivancos Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2018-04-04