Literature DB >> 2215294

Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability.

G Bordage1, J Grant, P Marsden.   

Abstract

This paper describes variables critical to diagnostic thinking that are based on research by Bordage and Grant & Marsden on the diagnostic thinking of medical students and experienced doctors. The purpose of the study is to use their findings to develop an inventory of diagnostic thinking. A 56-item diagnostic thinking inventory was initially developed; each item contains a stem followed by a 6-point, semantic differential scale. The inventory is designed to measure two aspects of diagnostic thinking: the degree of flexibility in thinking and the degree of knowledge structure in memory. The specific goal of the study is to determine which items discriminate best between weaker and stronger diagnosticians and to reduce the inventory to only those items which significantly contribute to the overall score. Thirty subjects from nine groups, each representing a distinct phase of medical education and clinical practice, participated, namely first- and third-year clinical medical students, house officers, senior house officers, registrars, senior registrars, consultants, trainees in general practice, and general practitioners, all from the UK (n = 270). Discrimination indices were calculated for each item. The revised version of the inventory contains 41 items. All the subjects found the exercise meaningful and the resulting scores showed variance and discrimination. The inventory will eventually be used to assess individual student's and clinician's diagnostic thinking and to plan ways of improving their diagnostic thinking.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2215294     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  18 in total

1.  Keeping a Flexible Differential Diagnosis: an Exercise in Clinical Reasoning.

Authors:  Paul A Bergl; Reza Manesh; Donald Basel; Andrew P J Olson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Teaching medical students the important connection between communication and clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Donna M Windish; Eboni G Price; Sarah L Clever; Jeffrey L Magaziner; Patricia A Thomas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A cohort study for the development and validation of a reflective inventory to quantify diagnostic reasoning skills in optometry practice.

Authors:  Amanda K Edgar; Lucinda Ainge; Simon Backhouse; James A Armitage
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  A learner-centered technique and clinical reasoning, reflection, and case presentation attributes in athletic training students.

Authors:  Scott Heinerichs; Luzita I Vela; Joshua M Drouin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Tracking reflective practice-based learning by medical students during an ambulatory clerkship.

Authors:  Patricia A Thomas; Harry Goldberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Influence of Virtual Reality Technology on Clinical Thinking Cultivation of Medical Students.

Authors:  Yuying Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study.

Authors:  James Bateman; Maggie E Allen; Jane Kidd; Nick Parsons; David Davies
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The role of strategy and redundancy in diagnostic reasoning.

Authors:  Ralph F Bloch; Daniel Hofer; Sabine Feller; Maria Hodel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Do different medical curricula influence self-assessed clinical thinking of students?

Authors:  Kirsten Gehlhar; Kathrin Klimke-Jung; Christoph Stosch; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2014-05-15

10.  Analysing clinical reasoning characteristics using a combined methods approach.

Authors:  Michele Groves; Marie-Louise Dick; Geoff McColl; Justin Bilszta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.