Literature DB >> 22151846

Four Year Follow-up of Dual Electrode Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain.

Kenneth M Aló1, Vladimir Redko, Jeffery Charnov.   

Abstract

This paper reports on 80 patients using dual electrode, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) over a four-year period Implant status, stimulation mode, anode-cathode configuration (array), cathode position, paresthesia overlap, explantation rates, complications, Visual Analog Scores (VAS), and overall satisfaction were examined in patients implanted with dual 8 contact, staggered, percutaneous electrodes. All patients had undergone implantation for chronic axial and extremity pain [e.g., Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)]. Outcomes were evaluated in view of our previous reports in this same group at 24 and 30 months (1,2). Data was collected by a disinterested third party. At 48 months, 18 of the original 80 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 62 patients contacted, 33 remained implanted and 29 (47%) had been explanted. After an average evaluation of 85 arrays (PainDoc, Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Plano, Texas), 88% of patients reported using one or two "best" arrays (bipolar or guarded tripolar) to maintain favorable paresthesia overlap (89%), VAS reduction (8.1 to 4.9), and overall patient satisfaction (63%). These arrays were most commonly positioned about the physiologic midline of the COL3-4 vertebral segments for upper extremity pain, and the T9-10 vertebral segments for low back and lower extremity pain. In contrast to our initial reports where essentially all patients preferred more than two arrays to maintain "best" paresthesia overlap and outcome, only 12% of these same patients maintained this trend in this long-term follow-up study. The arrays most commonly selected long-term as the "best" ones (88% of all electrodes) were narrow (adjacent contact) bipoles and guarded cathode tripoles (< 8 contacts). Thirty-five percent of patients with thoracic implants achieved paresthesia in the low back at 48 months. Explantation rates and overall patient satisfaction were significantly affected by painful radio frequency (RF) antenna coupling. This data supports the efficacy of dual electrodes in optimizing long-term SCS paresthesia overlap and complex pain outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 22151846     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2002.02017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  8 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-03-01

2.  Changes in Neuronal Activity in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Primary Somatosensory Cortex With Nonlinear Burst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Julia C Quindlen-Hotek; Alexander R Kent; Patrisia De Anda; Sonia Kartha; Alexander M Benison; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-02-06

3.  Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jing L Han; Kelly R Murphy; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Siyun Yang; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Promila Pagadala; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-15

4.  A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain.

Authors:  Thomas Stauss; Faycal El Majdoub; Dawood Sayed; Gernot Surges; William S Rosenberg; Leonardo Kapural; Richard Bundschu; Abdul Lalkhen; Nileshkumar Patel; Bradford Gliner; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan; Anand Rotte; Deborah R Edgar; Martin Bettag; Mohammad Maarouf
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.511

5.  Images in Practice: Replacement of an 18-Year-Old Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead with Cylindrical Leads Under Direct Visualization.

Authors:  Philip M Shumsky; Christopher S Wie; John A Freeman; Omar Viswanath; Naresh P Patel
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-07-04

6.  The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Kelly Ryan Murphy; Jing L Han; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Siyun Yang; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-10-03

7.  Neurostimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Sameer Jain; Corey Hunter; Krishnan Chakravarthy
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 8.  Pain relief and improvement in quality of life with 10 kHz SCS therapy: Summary of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Dawood Sayed; Jan Willem Kallewaard; Anand Rotte; Jessica Jameson; David Caraway
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.