Literature DB >> 22151707

Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: results of an international multicenter study.

John C Oakley1, Francisco Espinosa, Hans Bothe, John McKean, Peter Allen, Kim Burchiel, Gilbert Quartey, Geert Spincemaille, Bart Nuttin, Frans Gielen, Gary King, Jan Holsheimer.   

Abstract

Experienced neurosurgeons at eight spinal cord stimulation centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe participated in a study from 1997 to 2000 investigating the safety, performance, and efficacy of a Transverse Tripolar Stimulation (TTS) system invented at the University of Twente, the Netherlands. This device was proposed to improve the ability of spinal cord stimulation to adequately overlap paresthesia to perceived areas of pain. Fifty-six patients with chronic, intractable neuropathic pain of the trunk and/or limbs more than three months' duration (average 105 months) were enrolled with follow-up periods at 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. All patients had a new paddle-type lead implanted with four electrodes, three of them aligned in a row perpendicular to the cord. Fifteen of these patients did not undergo permanent implantation. Of the 41 patients internalized, 20 patients chose conventional programming using an implanted pulse generator to drive four electrodes, while 21 patients chose a tripole stimulation system, which used radiofrequency power and signal transmission and an implanted dual-channel receiver to drive three electrodes using simultaneous pulses of independently variable amplitude. On average, the visual analog scale scores dropped more for patients with TTS systems (32%) than for conventional polarity systems (16%). Conventional polarity systems were using higher frequencies on average, while usage range was similar. Most impressive was the well-controlled "steering" of the paresthesias according to the dermatomal topography of the dorsal columns when using the TTS-balanced pulse driver. The most common complication was lead migration. While the transverse stimulation system produced acceptable outcomes for overall pain relief, an analysis of individual pain patterns suggests that it behaves like spinal cord stimulation in general with the best control of extremity neuropathic pain. This transverse tripole lead and driving system introduced the concept of electrical field steering by selective recruitment of axonal nerve fiber tracts in the dorsal columns.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 22151707     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  6 in total

1.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

2.  Spinal cord stimulation: the clinical application of new technology.

Authors:  Dominic Hegarty
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-05

3.  Spinal cord stimulation in pain management: a review.

Authors:  Young Hoon Jeon
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2012-06-28

4.  Reoperation Rates of Percutaneous and Paddle Leads in Spinal Cord Stimulator Systems: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Devin D Antonovich; Willy Gama; Alexandra Ritter; Bethany Jacobs Wolf; Ryan H Nobles; Meron A Selassie; M Gabriel Hillegass
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.637

Review 5.  Effects of central nervous system electrical stimulation on non-neuronal cells.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Williams; Neetu Kushwah; Vaishnavi Dhawan; Xin Sally Zheng; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.