Literature DB >> 22151612

Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain.

G Barolat1, J C Oakley, J D Law, R B North, B Ketcik, A Sharan.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the outcomes of patients with intractable low-back pain treated with epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) utilizing paddle electrodes and a radio frequency (RF) stimulator. A multicenter prospective study was performed to collect data from patients suffering from chronic low-back pain. The study was designed to collect data from 60 patients at four centers and examine their outcomes at, or up to two years post implantation. Patients' participation included written responses to a series of preoperative questionnaires that were designed to collect previous surgical history information, leg and low back pain characteristics, and routine demographic information. Outcome measurements included the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and a patient satisfaction rating scale. Data were collected at each site during patient visits or by mail, at approximately six months, 12 months, and 24 months. A total of 44 patients have been implanted with a SCS system at the time of this writing. Follow-up data were available for 41 patients. Preoperatively, all patients reported more than 50% of their pain in the low back. All patients had pain in both their backs and legs. All patients showed a reported mean decrease in their 10-point VAS scores compared to baseline. The majority of patients reported fair to excellent pain relief in both the low back and legs. At six months 91.6% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the legs and 82.7% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the low back. At one year 88.2% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the legs and 68.8% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the low back. Significant improvement in function and quality of life was found at both the six-month and one-year follow-ups using the Oswestry and SIP, respectively. The majority of patients reported that the procedure was worthwhile (92% at six months, 88% at one year). No patient indicated that the procedure was not worthwhile. We conclude that SCS proved beneficial at one year for the treatment of patients with chronic low back and leg pain.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 22151612     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  16 in total

1.  Midline minimally invasive placement of spinal cord stimulators: a technical note.

Authors:  Edison P Valle-Giler; Wale A R Sulaiman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.

Authors:  Kasra Amirdelfan; Cong Yu; Matthew W Doust; Bradford E Gliner; Donna M Morgan; Leonardo Kapural; Ricardo Vallejo; B Todd Sitzman; Thomas L Yearwood; Richard Bundschu; Thomas Yang; Ramsin Benyamin; Abram H Burgher; Elizabeth S Brooks; Ashley A Powell; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-03-01

Review 4.  Spinal cord stimulation for intractable chronic pain.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation with implanted epidural paddle lead relieves chronic axial low back pain.

Authors:  David A Stidd; Sergio Rivero; Martin E Weinand
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  10-kHz High-Frequency SCS Therapy: A Clinical Summary.

Authors:  Marc Russo; Jean-Pierre Van Buyten
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Dorsal paddle leads implant for spinal cord stimulation through laminotomy with midline structures preservation.

Authors:  Massimo Mearini; Riccardo Bergomi; Pier Paolo Panciani; Roberto Stefini; Giacomo Esposito; G Marco Sicuri; Emanuele Costi; Gabriele Ronchetti; Marco Fontanella
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-12-31

8.  Spinal anesthesia and minimal invasive laminotomy for paddle electrode placement in spinal cord stimulation: technical report and clinical results at long-term followup.

Authors:  S Sarubbo; F Latini; V Tugnoli; R Quatrale; E Granieri; M A Cavallo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

9.  Treatment of chronic axial back pain with 60-day percutaneous medial branch PNS: Primary end point results from a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Christopher A Gilmore; Mehul J Desai; Thomas J Hopkins; Sean Li; Michael J DePalma; Timothy R Deer; Warren Grace; Abram H Burgher; Puneet K Sayal; Kasra Amirdelfan; Steven P Cohen; Meredith J McGee; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 10.  A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain.

Authors:  Paul Verrills; Chantelle Sinclair; Adele Barnard
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.