BACKGROUND: Right portal vein embolization (RPVE) has been utilized with or without segment IV (RPVE + IV) prior to hepatectomy to induce hypertrophy and prevent liver insufficiency in patients with a predicted future liver remnant (FLR) of ≤30% or cirrhosis. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent RPVE during 2006-2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative outcomes and complications were analysed. Computed tomography-based volumetrics were performed to determine FLR volume and degree of hypertrophy. Patients were stratified by segment IV embolization. Short-term outcomes following RPVE and liver resection are reported. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were identified. Ten patients underwent RPVE and 13 underwent RPVE + IV. The RPVE procedure resulted in a 38% increase in FLR volume. Liver volumes, hypertrophy rates and outcomes were similar in both groups. Rates of operative complications in the RPVE and RPVE + IV groups were similar at 50% and 54%, respectively, and most complications were minor. Complication rates as a result of embolization were 30% in the RPVE group and 31% in the RPVE + IV group. One patient underwent modified operative resection as a result of a complication of RPVE. CONCLUSIONS: Right portal vein embolization (±segment IV) is a safe and effective modality to increase FLR volume. Post-embolization complications and short-term outcomes after resection are acceptable and are similar in both RPVE and RPVE + IV.
BACKGROUND: Right portal vein embolization (RPVE) has been utilized with or without segment IV (RPVE + IV) prior to hepatectomy to induce hypertrophy and prevent liver insufficiency in patients with a predicted future liver remnant (FLR) of ≤30% or cirrhosis. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent RPVE during 2006-2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative outcomes and complications were analysed. Computed tomography-based volumetrics were performed to determine FLR volume and degree of hypertrophy. Patients were stratified by segment IV embolization. Short-term outcomes following RPVE and liver resection are reported. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were identified. Ten patients underwent RPVE and 13 underwent RPVE + IV. The RPVE procedure resulted in a 38% increase in FLR volume. Liver volumes, hypertrophy rates and outcomes were similar in both groups. Rates of operative complications in the RPVE and RPVE + IV groups were similar at 50% and 54%, respectively, and most complications were minor. Complication rates as a result of embolization were 30% in the RPVE group and 31% in the RPVE + IV group. One patient underwent modified operative resection as a result of a complication of RPVE. CONCLUSIONS: Right portal vein embolization (±segment IV) is a safe and effective modality to increase FLR volume. Post-embolization complications and short-term outcomes after resection are acceptable and are similar in both RPVE and RPVE + IV.
Authors: Lorenzo Capussotti; Andrea Muratore; Alessandro Ferrero; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Andrea Corgnier; Daniele Regge Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2005-11
Authors: Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Dorota A Doherty; Philippe Gertsch; Marc J Fenstermacher; Evelyne M Loyer; Jan Lerut; Roland Materne; Xuemei Wang; Arthur Encarnacion; Delise Herron; Christian Mathey; Giovanni Ferrari; Chuslip Charnsangavej; Kim-Anh Do; Alban Denys Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Donatella R Di Stefano; Thierry de Baere; Alban Denys; Antoine Hakime; Gilles Gorin; Michel Gillet; Jean Saric; Hervé Trillaud; Philippe Petit; Jean-Michel Bartoli; Dominique Elias; Jean-Robert Delpero Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-12-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yoji Kishi; Eddie K Abdalla; Yun Shin Chun; Daria Zorzi; David C Madoff; Michael J Wallace; Steven A Curley; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Anne M Covey; Karen T Brown; William R Jarnagin; Lynn A Brody; Lawrence Schwartz; Scott Tuorto; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Michael D'Angelica; George I Getrajdman; Ronald DeMatteo; Nancy E Kemeny; Yuman Fong Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Martin Zeile; Artur Bakal; Jan E Volkmer; Gregor A Stavrou; Philip Dautel; Jan Hoeltje; Axel Stang; Karl J Oldhafer; Roland Brüning Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Yoshihiro Mise; Thomas A Aloia; Claudius Conrad; Steven Y Huang; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sonia T Orcutt; Katsuhiro Kobayashi; Mark Sultenfuss; Brian S Hailey; Anthony Sparks; Bighnesh Satpathy; Daniel A Anaya Journal: Front Surg Date: 2016-03-11
Authors: E A Soykan; B M Aarts; M Lopez-Yurda; K F D Kuhlmann; J I Erdmann; N Kok; K P van Lienden; E A Wilthagen; R G H Beets-Tan; O M van Delden; F M Gomez; E G Klompenhouwer Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 2.740