Literature DB >> 22151137

Natural history of severe eosinophilia with uncertain aetiology and proposals on a practical approach to its management.

A L Ang1, R X Wong, Q Y Zhuang, Y C Linn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilia is commonly encountered during clinical practice. Some can be attributed to well-defined causes while others cannot. Optimal management of hypereosinophilia with unknown aetiology is uncertain as the natural history is not well described.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with hypereosinophilia (>5 × 10(9)/L) and described the characteristics, natural history and treatment of those with eosinophilia of uncertain aetiology.
RESULTS: There were 141 patients with hypereosinophilia: 87 with well-defined causes, 54 with uncertain aetiology. The latter was managed as hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (n = 5), idiopathic hypereosinophilia (IH) (n = 11), presumptive helminthic infection (n = 11) and reactive eosinophilia (n = 5), while 22 were insufficiently investigated and did not have definite working diagnoses. Their median age and peak eosinophil count were 64 (22 to 94) years and 10.0 (5.2-33.9) × 10(9)/L respectively. Forty-six per cent had symptoms attributable to eosinophilia, with the HES and insufficiently investigated groups having the highest (100%) and lowest (27%) percentages respectively. HES and IH patients were most extensively investigated. All 14 HES or IH patients who received steroids responded. All presumptive helminthic infection patients received mebendazole: nine responded, and two had unassessable responses. For the remaining patients, seven received steroids and all responded; one received mebendazole but defaulted; 19 were not treated: 11 resolved spontaneously. No non-HES patients developed eosinophilia-related organ dysfunction. No mortality was caused by hypereosinophilia.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypereosinophilia of uncertain aetiology can be empirically managed according to working diagnoses derived from history taking, examination and selective investigations. Most patients have benign short-term outcomes, but longer monitoring is required to assess long-term outcomes from untreated hypereosinophilia.
© 2011 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal © 2011 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22151137     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  4 in total

1.  Two cases of acute myelitis with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Rie Tohge; Yoko Warabi; Makio Takahashi; Masahiro Nagao
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-20

2.  Characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Grzegorz Helbig; Marek Hus; Tomasz Francuz; Joanna Dziaczkowska-Suszek; Anna Soja; Sławomira Kyrcz-Krzemień
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  The role of empirical albendazole treatment in idiopathic hypereosinophilia - a case series.

Authors:  Eleonora Vaisben; Ronen Brand; Anas Kadakh; Faris Nassar
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Severe Multi-Organ Failure and Hypereosinophilia: When to Call It "Idiopathic"?

Authors:  Massimo Radin; Luca Bertero; Dario Roccatello; Savino Sciascia
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.