Literature DB >> 22151060

The effects of spinal cord stimulation on quality of life in patients with therapeutically chronic refractory angina pectoris.

N C Vulink1, D M Overgaauw, G A Jessurun, I A Tenvaarwerk, T J Kropmans, C P van der Schans, B Middel, M J Staal, M J Dejongste.   

Abstract

Objective. For patients with refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a beneficial and safe adjuvant therapy. However, it has not yet been established whether SCS alters the quality of life (QoL) in these patients. Methods. In this study, 26 consecutive patients (age 61.3 ± 7.0 years, 13 females, angina duration 12.7 ± 6.0 years) were recruited. Social, mental, and physical aspects of QoL were determined by Nottingham Health Profile (NHP I), depression scale (CES-D), scoring of angina pectoris attacks and short-acting nitroglycerine intake, pain score on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), perceived health percentage, Satisfaction With Life scale (SWLS), and one-aspect Linear Analog Self Assessment scale (LASA). QoL outcomes at baseline were compared with reference values from healthy subjects. Within-group changes and magnitude of changes (effect size, ES) were assessed after 3 months and 1 year of SCS. Results. Compared to healthy subjects, the patients had significantly worse scores at baseline on NHP, SWLS, and LASA. After 3 months of SCS, NHP I aspect pain (ES = 1.39), AP-score (ES = 0.85), perceived health percentage (ES =- 0.80), NTG-use (ES = 1.08) and VAS-score (ES = 1.13) were all significantly improved (p < 0.05). After 3 months, moderate changes were observed; however, they were not statistically significant on the NHP-aspects "emotion" (ES = 0.57) and "sleep" (ES = 0.56). At the 1-year follow-up, significant and substantial improvements were found on NHP-I aspects: pain, energy, emotional reactions, social isolation, sleep, and physical mobility (p < 0.05) with changes that can be interpreted as large (ES > 0.80). Conclusion. QoL in patients with refractory angina pectoris is poor. Both pain and health aspects of QoL improved significantly after 3 months of SCS. Social, mental, and physical aspects of QoL were found improved after 1 year of SCS.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 22151060     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00033.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  4 in total

1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications, Mechanism of Action, and Efficacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation: an update.

Authors:  Steven Falowski; Amanda Celii; Ashwini Sharan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Pan; Hongguang Bao; Yanna Si; Chenjie Xu; Hao Chen; Xianzhong Gao; Xinyi Xie; Yajie Xu; Fan Sun; Lingqing Zeng
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Intracranial somatosensory responses with direct spinal cord stimulation in anesthetized sheep.

Authors:  Oliver E Flouty; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Chandan G Reddy; Douglas C Fredericks; Katherine N Gibson-Corley; Nicholas D Jeffery; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.