Literature DB >> 22150974

Prognostic significance of cyclinD1 amplification and the co-alteration of cyclinD1/pRb/ppRb in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

M-T Wang1, G Chen, S-J An, Z-H Chen, Z-M Huang, P Xiao, X-S Ben, Z Xie, S-L Chen, D-L Luo, J-M Tang, J-Y Lin, X-C Zhang, Y-L Wu.   

Abstract

CyclinD1/pRb/ppRb is one of the most important pathways regulating the cell cycle, and related with the development of many cancers. However, the co-alteration of CyclinD1/pRb/ppRb in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas is less understood. This study aims to analyze the combined prognostic significance of cyclinD1 (CCND1) DNA amplification and the co-alteration of CCND1/pRb/ppRB in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. CCND1 DNA amplification and the protein expression of CCND1, pRb, and ppRb on 100 tumor specimens and 11 normal tissues were detected using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Their prognosis significance was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. We found that 41% of the patients had CCND1 DNA amplification, which had a short survival time compared with the patients without CCND1 amplification (25.63 months vs. not reached, P=0.007). The patients with the co-alternation of CCND1(+) /pRb(-) /ppRb(+) protein expression levels have a poorer overall survival than the others (11.4 vs. 43.4 months, P=0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that the co-alternation of CCND1/pRb/ppRb and CyclinD1 amplification were the two most independent prognosis factors of patients with esophageal cancer. These findings suggested that CCND1 amplification and co-alternation of CCND1(+) /pRb(-) /ppRb(+) may play a crucial role in the prognostic evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer, and the patients with CCND1(+) /pRb(-) /ppRb(+) have the worst prognosis in all the patients. The results also indicated that the patients with CCND1 amplification or co-alternation of CyclinD1(+) /pRb(-) /ppRb(+) might be the preponderant people for therapy targeting the CCND1/pRb/ppRb pathway in the future.
© 2011 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22150974     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic value of differential CCND1 expression in patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Liqiang Ma; Xiaoting Wang; Fenghua Lan; Yinghao Yu; Xuenong Ouyang; Wei Liu; Feilai Xie; Qiaojia Huang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Evaluation of tumor metastasis-associated markers for molecular classification in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun-Xing Huang; Juan Yao; Mao-Song Lin; Mei Lin; Wei Xiao; Hong Yu; Ping Chen; Rong-Yu Qian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of tumor biomarkers in predicting prognosis in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Meilan Chen; Jizheng Huang; Zhenli Zhu; Jun Zhang; Ke Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Survivin small interfering RNA suppresses glioblastoma growth by inducing cellular apoptosis.

Authors:  Yanbo Liu; Chunming Miao; Zhenjiang Wang; Xin He; Weigao Shen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.135

5.  Concomitant depletion of PTEN and p27 and overexpression of cyclin D1 may predict a worse prognosis for patients with post-operative stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Lin-Lin Yin; Ke-Li Su; Gang-Feng Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Targeted next-generation sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies novel genetic alterations in HPV+ and HPV- tumors.

Authors:  Matthias Lechner; Garrett M Frampton; Tim Fenton; Andrew Feber; Gary Palmer; Amrita Jay; Nischalan Pillay; Martin Forster; Maureen T Cronin; Doron Lipson; Vincent A Miller; Timothy A Brennan; Stephen Henderson; Francis Vaz; Paul O'Flynn; Nicholas Kalavrezos; Roman Yelensky; Stephan Beck; Philip J Stephens; Chris Boshoff
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage.

Authors:  J M Findlay; M R Middleton; I Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Cyclin D1 expression predicts postoperative distant metastasis and survival in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue Hou; Run-Bin Liang; Jin-Chang Wei; Ying Xu; Jian-Hua Fu; Rong-Zhen Luo; Jie-Hua He; Lan-Jun Zhang; Peng Lin; Hao-Xian Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

9.  MiR-34a Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells via the RBP2/NOTCH1/CYCLIN D1 Coregulatory Network.

Authors:  Cong Fan; Lingfei Jia; Yunfei Zheng; Chanyuan Jin; Yunsong Liu; Hao Liu; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 10.  Chromosomal and Genomic Variations in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Technologies, Applications, and Prospections.

Authors:  Qi Song; Dongxian Jiang; Haixing Wang; Jie Huang; Yalan Liu; Chen Xu; Yingyong Hou
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.