Literature DB >> 22150963

Electrodermal lability as an indicator for subjective sleepiness during total sleep deprivation.

Lars Michael1, Sven Passmann, Ruth Becker.   

Abstract

The present study addresses the suitability of electrodermal lability as an indicator of individual vulnerability to the effects of total sleep deprivation. During two complete circadian cycles, the effects of 48h of total sleep deprivation on physiological measures (electrodermal activity and body temperature), subjective sleepiness (measured by visual analogue scale and tiredness symptom scale) and task performance (reaction time and errors in a go/no go task) were investigated. Analyses of variance with repeated measures revealed substantial decreases of the number of skin conductance responses, body temperature, and increases for subjective sleepiness, reaction time and error rates. For all changes, strong circadian oscillations could be observed as well. The electrodermal more labile subgroup reported higher subjective sleepiness compared with electrodermal more stable participants, but showed no differences in the time courses of body temperature and task performance. Therefore, electrodermal lability seems to be a specific indicator for the changes in subjective sleepiness due to total sleep deprivation and circadian oscillations, but not a suitable indicator for vulnerability to the effects of sleep deprivation per se.
© 2011 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22150963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00984.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  7 in total

1.  Feedback Blunting: Total Sleep Deprivation Impairs Decision Making that Requires Updating Based on Feedback.

Authors:  Paul Whitney; John M Hinson; Melinda L Jackson; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Raw scores on subjective sleepiness, fatigue, and vigor metrics consistently define resilience and vulnerability to sleep loss.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

3.  Electrodermal Activity Is Sensitive to Sleep Deprivation but Does Not Moderate the Effect of Total Sleep Deprivation on Affect.

Authors:  Courtney A Kurinec; Anthony R Stenson; John M Hinson; Paul Whitney; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Concordance of multiple methods to define resiliency and vulnerability to sleep loss depends on Psychomotor Vigilance Test metric.

Authors:  Erika M Yamazaki; Courtney E Casale; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

5.  Cognitive throughput and working memory raw scores consistently differentiate resilient and vulnerable groups to sleep loss.

Authors:  Tess E Brieva; Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.313

6.  Multi-Timescale Drowsiness Characterization Based on a Video of a Driver's Face.

Authors:  Quentin Massoz; Jacques G Verly; Marc Van Droogenbroeck
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Genetic Markers of Differential Vulnerability to Sleep Loss in Adults.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Namni Goel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.