Literature DB >> 22150352

Fixed versus mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a review of kinematics and results.

A P Apostolopoulos1, I V Michos, A F Mavrogenis, E Chronopoulos, G Papachristou, S N Lallos, N E Efstathopoulos.   

Abstract

There are several total knee arthroplasty designs available with wide variation in features. The long-term results of total knee replacement with a fixed bearing design have shown a high degree of clinical success. However, implant loosening and polyethylene wear became recognized as long-term causes of late failure. Mobile bearing knee replacements were designed to create a durable surface articulation by using a polyethylene insert that articulates with a metallic femoral component and a metallic tibial tray. The purpose of this article is to review clinical and basic scientific studies comparing the clinical results, the biomechanical features, and the kinematic patterns of fixed versus mobile bearing knee designs. Beside the fact that in vitro kinematic studies have shown reduced polyethylene wear in mobile bearings due to increased implant conformity and reduced polyethylene contact stresses, which should hypothetically prolong polyethylene life, various independent studies for both mobile bearing and fixed bearing prostheses have documented results that are comparable in terms of survival and performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22150352     DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v21.i3.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants        ISSN: 1050-6934


  3 in total

Review 1.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Higher use of fixed-bearing over mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized over medial pivot designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers from England and Wales, Australia, Norway, New Zealand, Germany and Switzerland.

Authors:  Ulrike Wittig; Maximilian Moshammer; Ines Vielgut; Georg Hauer; Patrick Reinbacher; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Different femorotibial contact points between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKAs do not show clinical impact.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.