Literature DB >> 22149906

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP.

Jae Hyuck Chang1, In Seok Lee, Yeon Soo Lim, Sung Hoon Jung, Chang Nyol Paik, Hyung Keun Kim, Tae Ho Kim, Chang Whan Kim, Sok Won Han, Myung-Gyu Choi, In-Sik Jung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the negative predictive value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for common bile duct (CBD) stones and the prognosis of patients suspected to have choledocholithiasis in whom the MRCP was negative for CBD stones.
METHODS: We enrolled the patients suspected to have choledocholithiasis in whom the MRCP was negative for the CBD stones between January 2008 and March 2011 and retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 115 patients.
RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 27 patients (23%, group 1), and none had CBD stones. The negative predictive value of MRCP was 100%. During a median follow-up of 18.3 months, acute cholangitis with newly developed CBD stones occurred in two patients. Eighty-eight patients (77%, group 2) did not undergo ERCP and all recovered from acute cholangitis without CBD surgery. During a median follow-up of 18.7 months, acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, and pancreatico-biliary cancers occurred in four (4.6%), three (3.5%), one (1.2%), and three (3.5%) patients, respectively. New CBD stones were found in only two patients among four patients with recurrent acute cholangitis. No patient had recurrent cholangitis caused by MRCP-missed CBD stones. The rates of recurrent cholangitis and cholangitis-free survival did not differ between groups 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION: The negative predictive value of MRCP was very high. ERCP can be reserved for patients who are MRCP negative for choledocholithiasis, but close follow-up is needed because of recurrent cholangitis or pancreatico-biliary cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22149906     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.638394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Gallstone Pancreatitis and Choledocholithiasis: Using Imaging and Laboratory Trends to Predict the Likelihood of Persistent Stones at Cholangiography.

Authors:  Nikhil Panda; Yuchiao Chang; Nalin Chokengarmwong; Myriam Martinez; Liyang Yu; Peter J Fagenholz; Haytham A Kaafarani; David R King; Marc A DeMoya; George C Velmahos; D Dante Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Abdeen Elfateh; Tariq Chundrigar; Bassem Othman; Owaid Almalki; Fares Rayza; Hashem Niyaz; Hesham Elmakhzangy; Mohammed Hatem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  A D Barlow; J Haqq; D McCormack; M S Metcalfe; A R Dennison; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services?

Authors:  J A Milburn; J A Bailey; Wk Dunn; I C Cameron; D S Gomez
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Francesco A Polistina; Mauro Frego; Marco Bisello; Emy Manzi; Antonella Vardanega; Bortolo Perin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28

7.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: role of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jinfeng Zang; Yin Yuan; Chi Zhang; Junye Gao
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in evaluation of obstructive jaundice with MRCP as gold standard.

Authors:  Hina Hanif; Sohail Ahmed Khan; Sobia Muneer; Syed Omair Adil
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Is preoperative MRCP necessary for patients with gallstones? An analysis of the factors related to missed diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by preoperative ultrasound.

Authors:  Yan Qiu; Zhengpeng Yang; Zhituo Li; Weihui Zhang; Dongbo Xue
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.