Literature DB >> 22149851

Development of a novel quality assurance system based on rolled-up and rolled-out radiochromic films in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Ji-Yeon Park1, Jeong-Woo Lee, Kyoung-Sik Choi, Jung Seok Lee, You-Hyun Kim, Semie Hong, Tae-Suk Suh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a cylindrical phantom with rolled-up radiochromic films and dose analysis software in the rolled-out plane for quality assurance (QA) in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
METHODS: The phantom consists of an acrylic cylindrical body wrapped with radiochromic film inserted into an outer cylindrical shell of 5 cm thickness. The rolled-up films with high spatial resolution enable detection of specific dose errors along the arc trajectory of continuously irradiated and modulated beams in VMAT. The developed dose analysis software facilitates dosimetric evaluation in the rolled-up and rolled-out planes of the film; the calculated doses on the corresponding points where the rolled-up film was placed were reconstructed into a rectangular dose matrix equivalent to that of the rolled-out plane of the film. The VMAT QA system was implemented in 3 clinical cases of prostate, nasopharynx, and pelvic metastasis. Each calculated dose on the rolled-out plane was compared with measurement values by modified gamma evaluation. Detected positions of dose disagreement on the rolled-out plane were also distinguished in cylindrical coordinates. The frequency of error occurrence and error distribution were summarized in a histogram and in an axial view of rolled-up plane to intuitively identify the corresponding positions of detected errors according to the gantry angle.
RESULTS: The dose matrix reconstructed from the developed VMAT QA system was used to verify the measured dose distribution along the arc trajectory. Dose discrepancies were detected on the rolled-out plane and visualized on the calculated dose matrix in cylindrical coordinates. The error histogram obtained by gamma evaluation enabled identification of the specific error frequency at each gantry angular position. The total dose error occurring on the cylindrical surface was in the range of 5%-8% for the 3 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed system provides a practical and reliable QA method to detect dosimetric errors according to the gantry angle. Film dosimetry based on rolled-up and rolled-out techniques leads to dose verification in the subspaces of the 3D dose volume. The system can be employed as an alternative tool to detect the pitfalls of planar dose verification.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22149851     DOI: 10.1118/1.3659706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  3D VMAT Verification Based on Monte Carlo Log File Simulation with Experimental Feedback from Film Dosimetry.

Authors:  A R Barbeiro; A Ureba; J A Baeza; R Linares; M Perucha; E Jiménez-Ortega; S Velázquez; J C Mateos; A Leal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Are simple IMRT beams more robust against MLC error? Exploring the impact of MLC errors on planar quality assurance and plan quality for different complexity beams.

Authors:  Jiazhou Wang; Xiance Jin; Jiayuan Peng; Jiang Xie; Junchao Chen; Weigang Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A study on the correlation between radiation field size and gamma index passing rate for MatriXX.

Authors:  Kai Xie; Hongfei Sun; Liugang Gao; Jianfeng Sui; Tao Lin; Xinye Ni
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Investigation on the effect of sharp phantom edges on point dose measurement during patient-specific dosimetry with Rapid Arc.

Authors:  R A Kinhikar; V P Pandey; Rojas K Jose; U Mahantshetty; D S Dhote; D D Deshpande; S K Shrivastava
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-07

5.  Three-dimensional radiochromic film dosimetry for volumetric modulated arc therapy using a spiral water phantom.

Authors:  Masao Tanooka; Hiroshi Doi; Hideharu Miura; Hiroyuki Inoue; Yasue Niwa; Yasuhiro Takada; Masayuki Fujiwara; Toshiyuki Sakai; Kiyoshi Sakamoto; Norihiko Kamikonya; Shozo Hirota
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  IMRT dose verification considering passing rate and respiratory motion.

Authors:  Kai Xie; Hongfei Sun; Tao Lin; Liugang Gao; Jianfeng Sui; Xinye Ni
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.