Jesse Dallery1, Bethany Raiff. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611, USA. dallery@ufl.edu
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Conceptualizing drug abuse within the framework of behavioral theories of choice highlights the relevance of environmental variables in shifting behavior away from drug-related purchases. Choosing to use drugs results in immediate and certain consequences (e.g., drug high and relief from withdrawal), whereas choosing abstinence typically results in delayed, and often uncertain, consequences (e.g., improved health, interpersonal relationships, money). METHODS: This is a selective review of the literature on Contingency management (CM). RESULTS: We highlight a variety of methods to deliver CM in practical, effective, and sustainable ways. We consider a number of parameters that are critical to the success of monetary-based CM, and the role of the context in influencing CM's effects. To illustrate the broad range of applications of CM, we also review different methods for arranging contingencies to promote abstinence and other relevant behavior. Finally, we discuss some considerations about how drug-dependent individuals allocate their finances in the context of CM interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Contingency management (CM) increases choice for drug abstinence via the availability of immediate, financial-based gains, contingent on objective evidence of abstinence.
UNLABELLED: Conceptualizing drug abuse within the framework of behavioral theories of choice highlights the relevance of environmental variables in shifting behavior away from drug-related purchases. Choosing to use drugs results in immediate and certain consequences (e.g., drug high and relief from withdrawal), whereas choosing abstinence typically results in delayed, and often uncertain, consequences (e.g., improved health, interpersonal relationships, money). METHODS: This is a selective review of the literature on Contingency management (CM). RESULTS: We highlight a variety of methods to deliver CM in practical, effective, and sustainable ways. We consider a number of parameters that are critical to the success of monetary-based CM, and the role of the context in influencing CM's effects. To illustrate the broad range of applications of CM, we also review different methods for arranging contingencies to promote abstinence and other relevant behavior. Finally, we discuss some considerations about how drug-dependent individuals allocate their finances in the context of CM interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Contingency management (CM) increases choice for drug abstinence via the availability of immediate, financial-based gains, contingent on objective evidence of abstinence.
Authors: K M Carroll; S A Ball; C Nich; P G O'Connor; D A Eagan; T L Frankforter; E G Triffleman; J Shi; B J Rounsaville Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-08
Authors: K Silverman; C J Wong; S T Higgins; R K Brooner; I D Montoya; C Contoreggi; A Umbricht-Schneiter; C R Schuster; K L Preston Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michelle L Miller; Amira Y Moreno; Shawn M Aarde; Kevin M Creehan; Sophia A Vandewater; Brittani D Vaillancourt; M Jerry Wright; Kim D Janda; Michael A Taffe Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jean C Beckham; Kelsie A Adkisson; Jeffrey Hertzberg; Nathan A Kimbrel; Alan J Budney; Robert S Stephens; Scott D Moore; Patrick S Calhoun Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.913