| Literature DB >> 22148106 |
Sun Joo Kim1, Jae Hyung Park, Dae Kyu Song, Kyung Sik Park, Jeong Eun Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Kwang Bum Cho, Byoung Kuk Jang, Woo Jin Chung, Jae Seok Hwang, Joong Goo Kwon, Tae Wan Kim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract occurs in about 76% of patients who are diabetic for more than 10 years. Although diabetes-related dysfunctions of the stomach such as gastroparesis have been extensively studied over the recent years, studies about the mechanism underlying colonic symptoms in long-term diabetes models are rare. Therefore, the goal of our study was to clarify the nature of colonic dysfunction in a long-term diabetic rat model.Entities:
Keywords: Colon; Diabetes mellitus; Gastrointestinal motility; Interstitial cells of Cajal
Year: 2011 PMID: 22148106 PMCID: PMC3228977 DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.4.372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil ISSN: 2093-0879 Impact factor: 4.924
Figure 1Spontaneous contractility of the proximal colon in control (A) and diabetes mellitus (B) rats. The degree of contractility was expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) (C). Values are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 compared to the control. DM, diabetes mellitus.
Figure 2Network of interstitial cells of Cajal in control (A) and diabetes mellitus (B) rats. Immunofluorescence corresponding to for c-Kit (green) was prepared in the proximal colon.
Figure 3Effects of carbachol on the contractility of the proximal colon in control and diabetes mellitus rats. Values are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 compared to the control value at the same concentration of carbachol. AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 4Expression of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in control (A) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (B) rats. Blue: nuclei, Green: M2 receptors, Red: M3 receptors (representative data from n = 6). Co-localization of M2 and nuclei in the control and DM rats (C). Co-localization of M3 and nuclei in control and DM rats (D). Values are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 5Response to electric field stimulation (EFS) in the proximal colon. (A) EFS (10 Hz) induced normal patterns of on-relaxation and off-contraction response in control rats. These responses disappeared after treatment with L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME). (B) In diabetes mellitus (DM) rat, the degrees of on-relaxation and off-contraction were less than those observed in the control. Both responses also disappeared after treatment with L-NAME. (C) Response of on-relaxations of the proximal colon in the control was more dependent on the EFS frequency than that of DM rats. (D) Response of off-contractions of the proximal colon in the control and DM rats. Values are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 compared to the control value at the stimulation of same frequency. **P < 0.001 compared to the control value at the stimulation of same frequency. AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 6Expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the control (A) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (B) rats. Blue: nuclei, Green: nNOS (representative data from n = 6). Co-localization of nNOS and nuclei in the control and DM rats (C). Values are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 6).