Literature DB >> 22147903

Clinical implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular strain and hypertrophy in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study.

Anders M Greve1, Kurt Boman, Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf, Y Antero Kesäniemi, Christoph Nienaber, Simon Ray, Kenneth Egstrup, Anne B Rossebø, Richard B Devereux, Lars Køber, Ronnie Willenheimer, Kristian Wachtell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of ECG left ventricular strain and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in asymptomatic aortic stenosis is not well described. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data were obtained in asymptomatic patients randomized to simvastatin/ezetimibe combination versus placebo in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study. Primary end point was the first of myocardial infarction, nonhemorrhagic stroke, heart failure, aortic valve replacement, or cardiovascular death. The predictive value of ECG left ventricular strain (defined as T-wave inversion in leads V(4) through V(6)) and LVH, assessed by Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria (R(V5-6)+S(V1) ≥35 mV) and Cornell voltage-duration criteria {[RaVL+S(V3)+(6 mV in women)]×QRS duration ≥2440 mV · ms}, was evaluated by adjustment for other prognostic covariates. A total of 1533 patients were followed for 4.3±0.8 years (6592 patient-years of follow-up), and 627 cardiovascular events occurred. ECG strain was present in 340 patients (23.6%), with LVH by Sokolow-Lyon voltage in 260 (17.1%) and by Cornell voltage-duration product in 220 (14.6%). In multivariable analyses, ECG left ventricular strain was associated with 3.1-fold higher risk of in-study myocardial infarction (95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.8; P=0.004). Similarly, ECG LVH by both criteria predicted, compared with no ECG LVH, 5.8-fold higher risk of heart failure (95% confidence interval, 2.0-16.8), 2.0-fold higher risk of aortic valve replacement (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.1; both P=0.001), and 2.5-fold higher risk of a combined end point of myocardial infarction, heart failure, or cardiovascular death (95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.9; P=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: ECG left ventricular strain and LVH were independently predictive of poor prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00092677.
© 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22147903     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.049759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

1.  Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Sayuri Yamabe; Yoshihiro Dohi; Akifumi Higashi; Hiroki Kinoshita; Yoshiharu Sada; Takayuki Hidaka; Satoshi Kurisu; Nobuo Shiode; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The impact of left ventricular hypertrophy on survival in candidates for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sachin Batra; Victor I Machicao; John S Bynon; Shivang Mehta; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Michael J Krowka; Steven Zacks; James Trotter; Kari E Roberts; Robert S Brown; Steven M Kawut; Michael B Fallon
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Electrocardiographic appearance of aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ivana I Vranic
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve stenosis: Correlation with echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Karolina Bula; Anna Ćmiel; Monika Sejud; Karolina Sobczyk; Sylwia Ryszkiewicz; Krzysztof Szydło; Marcin Wita; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with increased mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Ajayram V Ullal; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Robert M Minutello; Luke Kim; Geoffrey S Bergman; Dmitriy N Feldman; Harsimran Singh; Shing Chiu Wong; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Fragmented QRS complex may predict long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Cafer Panç; Arda Güler; Arda Can Doğan; Recep Gülmez; Ahmet Güner; Ömer Çelik
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-27

7.  Relations among depressive symptoms, electrocardiographic hypertrophy, and cardiac events in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  William Whang; Karina W Davidson; Nicholas O Palmeri; Anupama B Bhatt; James Peacock; William F Chaplin; Daichi Shimbo; Donald E Edmondson
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2015-10-08

8.  Gender differences in factors influencing electrocardiographic findings of left ventricular hypertrophy in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Shinji Satoh; Soichiro Omura; Hiroko Inoue; Emiko Ejima; Koutatsu Shimozono; Makiko Hayashi; Takahiro Mori; Katsuhiko Takenaka; Natsumi Kawamura; Kotaro Numaguchi; Etsuo Mori; Akemi Asoh; Toshihiro Nakamura; Koji Hiyamuta
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Impact of left ventricular remodelling patterns on outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Marie-Annick Clavel; Florent Le Ven; Abdellaziz Dahou; Christophe Thébault; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; Marie Arsenault; Élisabeth Bédard; Jonathan Beaudoin; Kim O'Connor; Mathieu Bernier; Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Electrocardiographic Versus Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Aleksandra Budkiewicz; Michał A Surdacki; Aleksandra Gamrat; Katarzyna Trojanowicz; Andrzej Surdacki; Bernadeta Chyrchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.