PURPOSE: For breast cancer, guidelines direct the delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy on the basis of lymph node status, histology, tumor size, grade, and hormonal receptor status. We explored how race/ethnicity, insurance, census tract-level poverty and education, and hospital Commission on Cancer (CoC) status were associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: Locoregional breast cancers diagnosed in 2004 (n = 6,734) were from the National Program of Cancer Registries-funded seven-state Patterns of Care study of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Predictors of guideline-concordant (receiving/not receiving) adjuvant systemic therapy, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, were explored by logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of women received nonguideline chemotherapy, 12% received nonguideline regimens, and 20% received nonguideline hormonal therapy. Significant predictors of nonguideline chemotherapy included Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.86), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96), and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.85), with adjustment for age, registry, and clinical variables. Predictors of nonguideline regimens among chemotherapy recipients included lack of insurance (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.92), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97), and low-education areas (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89) after adjustment. Living in high-poverty areas (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96) and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.83) predicted nonguideline hormonal therapy after adjustment. ORs for poverty, education, and insurance were attenuated in the full models. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic and hospital factors are associated with guideline-concordant use of systemic therapy for breast cancer. The identification of modifiable factors that lead to nonguideline treatment may reduce disparities in breast cancer survival.
PURPOSE: For breast cancer, guidelines direct the delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy on the basis of lymph node status, histology, tumor size, grade, and hormonal receptor status. We explored how race/ethnicity, insurance, census tract-level poverty and education, and hospital Commission on Cancer (CoC) status were associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: Locoregional breast cancers diagnosed in 2004 (n = 6,734) were from the National Program of Cancer Registries-funded seven-state Patterns of Care study of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Predictors of guideline-concordant (receiving/not receiving) adjuvant systemic therapy, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, were explored by logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of women received nonguideline chemotherapy, 12% received nonguideline regimens, and 20% received nonguideline hormonal therapy. Significant predictors of nonguideline chemotherapy included Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.86), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96), and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.85), with adjustment for age, registry, and clinical variables. Predictors of nonguideline regimens among chemotherapy recipients included lack of insurance (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.92), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97), and low-education areas (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89) after adjustment. Living in high-poverty areas (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96) and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.83) predicted nonguideline hormonal therapy after adjustment. ORs for poverty, education, and insurance were attenuated in the full models. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic and hospital factors are associated with guideline-concordant use of systemic therapy for breast cancer. The identification of modifiable factors that lead to nonguideline treatment may reduce disparities in breast cancer survival.
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Cyllene R Morris; Gretchen Kimmick; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Fabian Camacho; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Susan A Sabatino; Steven T Fleming; Joseph Lipscomb Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katrina F Trivers; Aliza K Fink; Ann H Partridge; Kutluk Oktay; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Chunyu Li; Lori A Pollack Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Catherine M Bender; Amanda L Gentry; Adam M Brufsky; Frances E Casillo; Susan M Cohen; Meredith M Dailey; Heidi S Donovan; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Rachel C Jankowitz; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Paula R Sherwood; Susan M Sereika Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: J Rodon; J C Soria; R Berger; G Batist; A Tsimberidou; C Bresson; J J Lee; E Rubin; A Onn; R L Schilsky; W H Miller; A M Eggermont; J Mendelsohn; V Lazar; R Kurzrock Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jennifer A Schlichting; Amr S Soliman; Catherine Schairer; David Schottenfeld; Sofia D Merajver Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Fang Zhang; Anita K Wagner; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Craig C Earle; Matthew Callahan; Robert LeCates; Xin Xu; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 3.402