BACKGROUND: High serum uric acid (SUA) has been well demonstrated to be associated with morbidity and mortality in the general population as well as in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent studies show that the clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) is a new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex CAD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SUA was associated with the complexity of CAD as evaluated by the CSS. METHODS: The study population consisted of 451 patients (69% male) who underwent coronary angiography for the assessment of CAD. A lesion was defined as significant if it caused a 50% reduction of the luminal diameter by visual estimation in vessels ≥1.5 mm. CSS was calculated by multiplying the SYNTAX score by a modified value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age/ejection fraction +1 for each 10 mL the creatinine clearance <60 mL/min per 1.73 m²). RESULTS: All subjects were divided into three groups according to CSS tertiles: CSSLOW (CSS 2-11; n = 147), CSSMID (CSS 12-21; n = 152), and CSSHIGH (CSS 22-68; n = 152). The SUA level was prominently related with CSS (5.29 ± 1.23 mg/dL, 6.92 ± 1.23 mg/dL, and 8.31 ± 1.46 mg/dL; P<.001). SUA was a significant predictor of CSS after adjustment for other risk factors (OR, 2.68; P<.001). CONCLUSION: SUA level was significantly associated with the severity and complexity of CAD evaluated by CSS. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to clarify the exact physiopathologic role of SUA in CAD.
BACKGROUND: High serum uric acid (SUA) has been well demonstrated to be associated with morbidity and mortality in the general population as well as in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent studies show that the clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) is a new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex CAD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SUA was associated with the complexity of CAD as evaluated by the CSS. METHODS: The study population consisted of 451 patients (69% male) who underwent coronary angiography for the assessment of CAD. A lesion was defined as significant if it caused a 50% reduction of the luminal diameter by visual estimation in vessels ≥1.5 mm. CSS was calculated by multiplying the SYNTAX score by a modified value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age/ejection fraction +1 for each 10 mL the creatinine clearance <60 mL/min per 1.73 m²). RESULTS: All subjects were divided into three groups according to CSS tertiles: CSSLOW (CSS 2-11; n = 147), CSSMID (CSS 12-21; n = 152), and CSSHIGH (CSS 22-68; n = 152). The SUA level was prominently related with CSS (5.29 ± 1.23 mg/dL, 6.92 ± 1.23 mg/dL, and 8.31 ± 1.46 mg/dL; P<.001). SUA was a significant predictor of CSS after adjustment for other risk factors (OR, 2.68; P<.001). CONCLUSION:SUA level was significantly associated with the severity and complexity of CAD evaluated by CSS. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to clarify the exact physiopathologic role of SUA in CAD.
Authors: Ender Özgün Çakmak; Emrah Bayam; Mehmet Çelik; Muzaffer Kahyaoğlu; Kıvanç Eren; Elmin Imanov; Ali Karagöz; İbrahim Akın İzgi Journal: Pulse (Basel) Date: 2021-03-04