Literature DB >> 22147202

Effects of the long-term administration of nebivolol on the clinical symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular function of patients with diastolic dysfunction: results of the ELANDD study.

Viviane M Conraads1, Marco Metra, Otto Kamp, Gilles W De Keulenaer, Burkert Pieske, José Zamorano, Panos E Vardas, Michael Böhm, Livio Dei Cas.   

Abstract

AIMS: We hypothesized that nebivolol, a beta-blocker with nitric oxide-releasing properties, could favourably affect exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 116 subjects with HFPEF, in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >45%, and with echo-Doppler signs of LV diastolic dysfunction, were randomized to 6 months treatment with nebivolol or placebo, following a double-blind, parallel group design. The primary endpoint of the study was the change in 6 min walk test distance (6MWTD) after 6 months. Nebivolol did not improve 6MWTD (from 420 ± 143 to 428 ± 141 m with nebivolol vs. from 412 ± 123 to 446 ± 119 m with placebo, P = 0.004 for interaction) compared with placebo, and the peak oxygen uptake also remained unchanged (peakVO(2); from 17.02 ± 4.79 to 16.32 ± 3.76 mL/kg/min with nebivolol vs. from 17.79 ± 5.96 to 18.59 ± 5.64 mL/kg/min with placebo, P = 0.63 for interaction). Resting and peak blood pressure and heart rate decreased with nebivolol. A significant correlation was found between the change in peak exercise heart rate and that in peakVO(2) (r = 0.391; P = 0.003) for the nebivolol group. Quality of life, assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, and NYHA classification improved to a similar extent in both groups, whereas N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) plasma levels remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, 6 months treatment with nebivolol did not improve exercise capacity in patients with HFPEF. Its negative chronotropic effect may have contributed to this result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22147202     DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  66 in total

Review 1.  Novel paradigms in the therapeutic management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Fayez El Shear
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-10-15

2.  Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction and with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  J Petutschnigg; F Edelmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Patient selection in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction clinical trials.

Authors:  Jacob P Kelly; Robert J Mentz; Alexandre Mebazaa; Adriaan A Voors; Javed Butler; Lothar Roessig; Mona Fiuzat; Faiez Zannad; Bertram Pitt; Christopher M O'Connor; Carolyn S P Lam
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: mechanisms, clinical features, and therapies.

Authors:  Kavita Sharma; David A Kass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Influence of vascular function and pulsatile hemodynamics on cardiac function.

Authors:  Vanessa Bell; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  [New therapy concepts for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction].

Authors:  C Tschöpe; B Pieske
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  CSI position statement on management of heart failure in India.

Authors:  Santanu Guha; S Harikrishnan; Saumitra Ray; Rishi Sethi; S Ramakrishnan; Suvro Banerjee; V K Bahl; K C Goswami; Amal Kumar Banerjee; S Shanmugasundaram; P G Kerkar; Sandeep Seth; Rakesh Yadav; Aditya Kapoor; Ajaykumar U Mahajan; P P Mohanan; Sundeep Mishra; P K Deb; C Narasimhan; A K Pancholia; Ajay Sinha; Akshyaya Pradhan; R Alagesan; Ambuj Roy; Amit Vora; Anita Saxena; Arup Dasbiswas; B C Srinivas; B P Chattopadhyay; B P Singh; J Balachandar; K R Balakrishnan; Brian Pinto; C N Manjunath; Charan P Lanjewar; Dharmendra Jain; Dipak Sarma; G Justin Paul; Geevar A Zachariah; H K Chopra; I B Vijayalakshmi; J A Tharakan; J J Dalal; J P S Sawhney; Jayanta Saha; Johann Christopher; K K Talwar; K Sarat Chandra; K Venugopal; Kajal Ganguly; M S Hiremath; Milind Hot; Mrinal Kanti Das; Neil Bardolui; Niteen V Deshpande; O P Yadava; Prashant Bhardwaj; Pravesh Vishwakarma; Rajeeve Kumar Rajput; Rakesh Gupta; S Somasundaram; S N Routray; S S Iyengar; G Sanjay; Satyendra Tewari; Sengottuvelu G; Soumitra Kumar; Soura Mookerjee; Tiny Nair; Trinath Mishra; U C Samal; U Kaul; V K Chopra; V S Narain; Vimal Raj; Yash Lokhandwala
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2018-06-08

Review 8.  Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Challenges and Future Directions.

Authors:  Bharathi Upadhya; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.571

9.  [Diastolic heart failure: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction].

Authors:  P Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 10.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.