Literature DB >> 22146498

Incremental value of an integrated adenosine stress-rest MDCT perfusion protocol for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Nuno Bettencourt1, João Rocha, Nuno Ferreira, Gustavo Pires-Morais, Mónica Carvalho, Daniel Leite, Bruno Melica, Lino Santos, Alberto Rodrigues, Pedro Braga, Madalena Teixeira, Lino Simões, Adelino Leite-Moreira, Silva Cardoso, Eike Nagel, Vasco Gama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preliminary studies have shown the potential of myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) analysis for ischemia detection in both animals and humans.
OBJECTIVE: To provide validation data on stress-rest CTP protocols as additive tools to improve the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Ninety symptomatic patients with suspected CAD (62 ± 8 years, 66% males) underwent both MDCT and invasive coronary angiography (XA). The MDCT protocol included a prospective calcium score acquisition, a helical acquisition with retrospective gating during infusion of adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) and a prospective scan for computed tomography angiography (CTA) at rest (total effective radiation dose: 5.1 ± 0.8 mSv). Significant and higher-grade CADs were defined by the presence of ≥50% or ≥70% stenosis in at least one coronary artery, as evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using XA images.
RESULTS: On a patient-based model, CTA sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to detect ≥50% or ≥70% stenosis were 98%, 71%, 80%, and 97% (global accuracy 86%) and 100%, 60%, 64%, and 100% (accuracy 77%), respectively. An integrative approach of CTA and CTP results had the best performance for detection of CAD with sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 98%, and NPV of 84% (accuracy 84%) for detection of 50% stenosis and 97%, 90%, 88%, and 98% (accuracy 93%), respectively, for the 70% threshold. The integration of results had the best overall performance in all scenarios but was particularly advantageous in the prediction of higher-grade CAD, with an area under the curve of 0.93, compared with 0.80 for isolated CTA and 0.82 for CTP and in patients with severe calcifications (sensitivity 92%, specificity 87%, overall accuracy of 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: The integration of functional and morphological data using CTA and CTP improved MDCT accuracy for detection of clinically relevant CAD at both thresholds of 50% and 70% in this intermediate to high pretest probability population.
Copyright © 2011 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22146498     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion with stress dual-energy CT: iodine concentration differences between normal and ischemic or necrotic myocardium. Initial experience.

Authors:  Carlos Delgado Sánchez-Gracián; Roque Oca Pernas; Carmen Trinidad López; Eloísa Santos Armentia; Antonio Vaamonde Liste; María Vázquez Caamaño; Gonzalo Tardáguila de la Fuente
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Francesco Maffessanti; Mita B Patel; Kalie Kebed; Akhil Narang; Amita Singh; Diego Medvedofsky; S Javed Zaidi; Anuj Mediratta; Neha Goyal; Nadjia Kachenoura; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Rationale and design of the dual-energy computed tomography for ischemia determination compared to "gold standard" non-invasive and invasive techniques (DECIDE-Gold): A multicenter international efficacy diagnostic study of rest-stress dual-energy computed tomography angiography with perfusion.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Paul Knaapen; Gianluca Pontone; Daniele Andreini; Jonathon Leipsic; Patricia Carrascosa; Bin Lu; Kelley Branch; Subha Raman; Stephen Bloom; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.

Authors:  Marta Ponte; Nuno Bettencourt; Eulália Pereira; Nuno Dias Ferreira; Amedeo Chiribiri; Andreas Schuster; Aníbal Albuquerque; Vasco Gama; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with cardiac computed tomography: state of the art.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Nicole M Bhave; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Shah M Azarisman; Karen S Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

8.  Dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Estêvan Vieira Cabeda; Andréa Maria Gomes Falcão; José Soares; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; César Higa Nomura; Luiz Francisco Rodrigues Ávila; José Rodrigues Parga
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Saeed Mirsadraee; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas W Weir; Alison Fletcher; Christophe Lucatelli; Tom MacGillivray; Saroj K Golay; Nicholas L Cruden; Peter A Henriksen; Neal Uren; Graham McKillop; João A C Lima; John H Reid; Edwin J R van Beek; Dilip Patel; David E Newby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.