Literature DB >> 22146112

Relative reinforcing value of energy-dense snack foods in overweight and obese adults.

Gary S Goldfield1, Andrew B Lumb, Cynthia K Colapinto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Obese people find energy-dense food more reinforcing than do their non-obese peers, and reinforcement influences food intake. We examined how the degree of adiposity, measured by body mass index (BMI), is associated with the relative reinforcing value of energy-dense snack foods versus fruits and vegetables in overweight and obese people.
METHODS: Ninety-two overweight or obese students in introductory psychology courses completed questionnaires on age, sex, BMI, hunger, smoking status, dietary restraint, and hedonic (liking) ratings for energy-dense snack foods and fruits and vegetables. The questionnaire also was used to evaluate the relative reinforcing value of these snack foods in comparison with fruits and vegetables.
RESULTS: The BMI predicted the relative reinforcing value of energy-dense snack food. This positive relationship remained significant after we controlled for age, sex, dietary restraint, hunger, smoking status, and snack food hedonics.
CONCLUSIONS: The greater the degree of overweight and obesity, the greater the motivation to obtain energy-dense snack foods. Because the rewarding value of food is a strong determinant of energy intake, a useful approach to preventing and treating obesity may be introducing pharmacological or behavioural nutrition intervention to reduce the rewarding value of energy-dense snack foods, or increasing the rewarding value of fruits and vegetables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22146112     DOI: 10.3148/72.4.2011.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Diet Pract Res        ISSN: 1486-3847            Impact factor:   0.940


  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity to reward is associated with snack and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents.

Authors:  Nathalie De Cock; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Leentje Vervoort; Jolien Vangeel; Lea Maes; Steven Eggermont; Caroline Braet; Carl Lachat; Lieven Huybregts; Lien Goossens; Kathleen Beullens; Patrick Kolsteren; John Van Camp
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Food packaging cues influence taste perception and increase effort provision for a recommended snack product in children.

Authors:  Laura Enax; Bernd Weber; Maren Ahlers; Ulrike Kaiser; Katharina Diethelm; Dominik Holtkamp; Ulya Faupel; Hartmut H Holzmüller; Mathilde Kersting
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Systematically testing the effects of promotion techniques on children's fruit and vegetables intake on the long term: a protocol study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frans Folkvord
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Is it Worth the Effort? Novel Insights into Obesity-Associated Alterations in Cost-Benefit Decision-Making.

Authors:  David Mathar; Annette Horstmann; Burkhard Pleger; Arno Villringer; Jane Neumann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Demographic and psychographic associations of consumer intentions to purchase healthier food products.

Authors:  Melissa Burton; Wei Chun Wang; Anthony Worsley
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2014-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.