PURPOSE: Recent surgical techniques have been advancing under endoscopic view and insufflation of carbon dioxide gas to expand the abdominal cavity. Isotonic fluid could be one candidate for expanding cavities to facilitate surgical maneuvering. We tested the feasibility and drawbacks of replacement of irrigating materials using a porcine model (water-filled laparoendoscopic surgery [WAFLES]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in two porcine models using instillation of sorbitol solution as irrigant. Solution irrigation was performed through one of four ports, with drainage via another port. Conventional forceps equipped with a monopolar electrode for electrocautery, laparoscope, video processor, ultrasound, and transducer for measuring intraabdominal pressure were used. RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully undertaken with the following benefits: (1) clear observation of the dissecting plane throughout maneuvering; (2) control of oozing and spilled bile by irrigation and suction; and (3) ultrasonographic and laparoscopic images can be obtained simultaneously without any restriction to probe location. However, two disadvantages should be noted: (1) difficulties in managing floating organs and (2) interruption of vision by blood. CONCLUSIONS: WAFLES provides some benefits for endoscopic surgery with proper devices, including apparatuses for irrigation and suction. Efficient irrigation and selection of proper irrigant and apparatuses are required to establish an acceptable procedure.
PURPOSE: Recent surgical techniques have been advancing under endoscopic view and insufflation of carbon dioxide gas to expand the abdominal cavity. Isotonic fluid could be one candidate for expanding cavities to facilitate surgical maneuvering. We tested the feasibility and drawbacks of replacement of irrigating materials using a porcine model (water-filled laparoendoscopic surgery [WAFLES]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in two porcine models using instillation of sorbitol solution as irrigant. Solution irrigation was performed through one of four ports, with drainage via another port. Conventional forceps equipped with a monopolar electrode for electrocautery, laparoscope, video processor, ultrasound, and transducer for measuring intraabdominal pressure were used. RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully undertaken with the following benefits: (1) clear observation of the dissecting plane throughout maneuvering; (2) control of oozing and spilled bile by irrigation and suction; and (3) ultrasonographic and laparoscopic images can be obtained simultaneously without any restriction to probe location. However, two disadvantages should be noted: (1) difficulties in managing floating organs and (2) interruption of vision by blood. CONCLUSIONS: WAFLES provides some benefits for endoscopic surgery with proper devices, including apparatuses for irrigation and suction. Efficient irrigation and selection of proper irrigant and apparatuses are required to establish an acceptable procedure.