Literature DB >> 22143405

A two-way enriched clinical trial design: combining advantages of placebo lead-in and randomized withdrawal.

Anastasia Ivanova1, Roy N Tamura2.   

Abstract

A new clinical trial design, designated the two-way enriched design (TED), is introduced, which augments the standard randomized placebo-controlled trial with second-stage enrichment designs in placebo non-responders and drug responders. The trial is run in two stages. In the first stage, patients are randomized between drug and placebo. In the second stage, placebo non-responders are re-randomized between drug and placebo and drug responders are re-randomized between drug and placebo. All first-stage data, and second-stage data from first-stage placebo non-responders and first-stage drug responders, are utilized in the efficacy analysis. The authors developed one, two and three degrees of freedom score tests for treatment effect in the TED and give formulae for asymptotic power and for sample size computations. The authors compute the optimal allocation ratio between drug and placebo in the first stage for the TED and compare the operating characteristics of the design to the standard parallel clinical trial, placebo lead-in and randomized withdrawal designs. Two motivating examples from different disease areas are presented to illustrate the possible design considerations.
© The Author(s) 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  placebo lead-in; placebo response; placebo run-in; randomized withdrawal; sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143405     DOI: 10.1177/0962280211431023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  4 in total

Review 1.  The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?

Authors:  Paul Enck; Ulrike Bingel; Manfred Schedlowski; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials--Old ideas and new insights.

Authors:  Daniel M Goldenholz; Shira R Goldenholz
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Does accounting for seizure frequency variability increase clinical trial power?

Authors:  Daniel M Goldenholz; Shira R Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jacqueline French; Daniel Lowenstein; Ruben Kuzniecky; Sheryl Haut; Sabrina Cristofaro; Kamil Detyniecki; John Hixson; Philippa Karoly; Mark Cook; Alex Strashny; William H Theodore; Carl Pieper
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  John D. Loeser Award Lecture: Size does matter, but it isn't everything: the challenge of modest treatment effects in chronic pain clinical trials.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Maurizio Fava; Mark P Jensen; Omar B Mbowe; Michael P McDermott; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.926

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.