Literature DB >> 22143401

Single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging to detect cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

David Thompson1, Matthew J Koster, Robert H Wagner, Alain Heroux, John T Barron.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients. This study evaluates the usefulness of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and various SPECT-derived diastolic variables to detect CAV in heart transplant patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A retrospective review of 141 SPECT studies with corresponding coronary angiograms within 12 months was performed on 99 transplant recipients. Diastolic function was assessed using computer-derived measures of peak filling rate (PFR), time to peak filling rate (TPFR), and mean first one-third filling rate (MFR/3). Angiography identified CAV in 53 of the 141 studies (38%). Of the 53, SPECT identified 7 with reversible myocardial defects (sensitivity 13%) and stress-induced electrocardiographic evidence of ischaemia was seen in one patient (sensitivity 2%). SPECT imaging was negative in 86 of the 88 negative coronary angiograms (specificity 98%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 78 and 65%, respectively. If a more stringent definition of CAV was used (≥70% stenosis), the sensitivity and specificity were unchanged (14 and 98%, respectively). There was no statistical difference in diastolic variables between patients with or without angiographic evidence of CAV in regard to PFR (3.57 ± 1.14 vs. 3.18 ± 1.21 EDV/s, P = 0.90), TPFR (149 ± 32 vs. 153 ± 43 ms, P = 0.33), or MFR/3 (1.37 ± 0.43 vs. 1.27 ± 0.42 EDV/s, P = 0.94).
CONCLUSION: Adenosine stress/rest technetium-99m tetrofosmin-gated SPECT is not a sensitive test for detection of CAV in heart transplant recipients. Diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by SPECT, was not shown to be associated with development of CAV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143401     DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in patients after cardiac transplantation and in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Bhanu Gupta; Dany Jacob; Randall Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Patrick Martineau; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Should positron emission tomography be the standard of care for non-invasive surveillance following cardiac transplantation?

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Leakage and water exchange characterization of gadofosveset in the myocardium.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Daniel C Lee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Neil R Chatterjee; James C Carr; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Myocardial perfusion imaging for cardiac allograft vasculopathy assessment: Evidence grows, but questions remain.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya; Indranee Rajapreyar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Clinical Utility of SPECT in the Heart Transplant Population: Analysis From a Single Large-volume Center.

Authors:  Jack Aguilar; Robert J H Miller; Yuka Otaki; Balaji Tamarappoo; Sean Hayes; John Friedman; Piotr J Slomka; Louise E J Thomson; Michelle Kittleson; Jignesh K Patel; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.385

8.  The pressure/volume relationship during dobutamine stress echocardiography in transplanted heart: comparison with quality of life and coronary anatomy.

Authors:  Giovanni Minardi; Giordano Zampi; Amedeo Pergolini; Giovanni Pulignano; Massimiliano Scappaticci; Francesca Moschella Orsini; Gaetano Pero; Paola Lilla Della Monica; Giovanni Cioffi; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.