STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The authors review complications, as reported in the literature, associated with ventral and posterolateral approaches to the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: The lateral extracavitary, costotransversectomy, and transthoracic thoracotomy techniques allow surgeons to access the ventral thoracic spine for a wide range of spinal disorders including tumor, degeneration, trauma, and infection. Although the transthoracic thoracotomy has been used traditionally to reach the ventral thoracic spine when access to the vertebral body is required, modifications to the various dorsal approaches have enabled surgeons to achieve goals of decompression, reconstruction, and stabilization through a single approach. METHODS: A systematic Medline search from 1991 to 2011 was performed to identify series reporting clinical data related to these surgical approaches. The morbidity associated with each approach is reviewed and strategies for complications avoidance are discussed. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred seventy-seven articles that assessed outcomes of the approaches to the thoracic spine were identified; of these 31 studies that consisted of 774 patients were selected for inclusion. A mean complication rate of 39%, 17%, and 15% for thoracotomy, lateral extracavitary, and costotransversectomy, respectively, was determined. The thoracotomy approach had the highest reoperation (3.5%) and mortality rates (1.5%). The specific complications and neurological outcomes were categorized. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of the surgical approaches to the thoracic spine have been reported with great detail in the literature. There are limited studies comparing the respective advantages and disadvantages and the differences in technique and outcome between these approaches. The present review suggests that in contrast to the historical experience of the laminectomy for thoracic spine disorders, these alternative approaches are safe and rarely associated with neurological deterioration. The differences between these approaches are based on their complication profiles. A thorough understanding of the regional anatomy will help avoid approach-related complications.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The authors review complications, as reported in the literature, associated with ventral and posterolateral approaches to the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: The lateral extracavitary, costotransversectomy, and transthoracic thoracotomy techniques allow surgeons to access the ventral thoracic spine for a wide range of spinal disorders including tumor, degeneration, trauma, and infection. Although the transthoracic thoracotomy has been used traditionally to reach the ventral thoracic spine when access to the vertebral body is required, modifications to the various dorsal approaches have enabled surgeons to achieve goals of decompression, reconstruction, and stabilization through a single approach. METHODS: A systematic Medline search from 1991 to 2011 was performed to identify series reporting clinical data related to these surgical approaches. The morbidity associated with each approach is reviewed and strategies for complications avoidance are discussed. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred seventy-seven articles that assessed outcomes of the approaches to the thoracic spine were identified; of these 31 studies that consisted of 774 patients were selected for inclusion. A mean complication rate of 39%, 17%, and 15% for thoracotomy, lateral extracavitary, and costotransversectomy, respectively, was determined. The thoracotomy approach had the highest reoperation (3.5%) and mortality rates (1.5%). The specific complications and neurological outcomes were categorized. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of the surgical approaches to the thoracic spine have been reported with great detail in the literature. There are limited studies comparing the respective advantages and disadvantages and the differences in technique and outcome between these approaches. The present review suggests that in contrast to the historical experience of the laminectomy for thoracic spine disorders, these alternative approaches are safe and rarely associated with neurological deterioration. The differences between these approaches are based on their complication profiles. A thorough understanding of the regional anatomy will help avoid approach-related complications.
Authors: Fabio Cofano; Giuseppe Di Perna; Nicola Marengo; Marco Ajello; Antonio Melcarne; Francesco Zenga; Diego Garbossa Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Rafid Al-Mahfoudh; Paul S Mitchell; Martin Wilby; Daniel Crooks; Chris Barrett; Robin Pillay; Tim Pigott Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2015-12-19