Literature DB >> 22142208

The effects of valence and arousal on the emotional modulation of time perception: evidence for multiple stages of processing.

Stephen D Smith1, Theresa A McIver, Michelle S J Di Nella, Michelle L Crease.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that both emotional valence and arousal can influence the subjective experience of time. The current research extends this work by (1) identifying how quickly this emotional modulation of time perception can occur and (2) examining whether valence and arousal have different effects at different stages of perception. These questions were addressed using a temporal bisection task. In each block of this task, participants are trained to distinguish between two different exposure durations. Participants are then shown stimuli presented at a number of durations that fall between the two learned times, and are asked to indicate whether the test stimulus was closer in duration to the shorter or longer learned item. In the current study, participants completed blocks of trials in which the durations were "Short" (100-300 ms) or "Long" (400-1600 ms). Stimuli consisted of neutral photographs as well as four categories of emotional images: high-arousal negative, high-arousal positive, low-arousal negative, and low-arousal positive. In Short blocks, arousing and nonarousing negative images were judged to have been shown for shorter durations than they actually were (i.e., the duration was underestimated); this effect occurred at durations as brief as 133 ms. In Long blocks, the display time for highly arousing negative items was overestimated, whereas durations were underestimated for highly arousing positive items and less arousing negative items. These data suggest that arousal and valence have different effects at different stages of perception, possibly due to the different neural structures involved at each stage of the emotional modulation of time perception. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22142208     DOI: 10.1037/a0026145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  17 in total

1.  Recent advances in understanding emotion-driven temporal distortions.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

2.  Do the young and the old perceive emotional intervals differently when shown on a younger or older face?

Authors:  L Micillo; F Stablum; G Mioni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 3.  Emotional modulation of interval timing and time perception.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake; Kevin S LaBar; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Time perception at different EEG-vigilance levels.

Authors:  Juliane Minkwitz; Maja U Trenner; Christian Sander; Sebastian Olbrich; Abigail J Sheldrick; Ulrich Hegerl; Hubertus Himmerich
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  The Influence of Odors on Time Perception.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Millot; Lucie Laurent; Laurence Casini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17

6.  Symmetry Lasts Longer Than Random, but Only for Brief Presentations.

Authors:  Ruth Ogden; Alexis D J Makin; Letizia Palumbo; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-11-16

7.  Perceiving control over aversive and fearful events can alter how we experience those events: an investigation of time perception in spider-fearful individuals.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17

8.  Emotion and magnitude perception: number and length bisection.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The color red distorts time perception for men, but not for women.

Authors:  Masahiro Shibasaki; Nobuo Masataka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Deconstructing the Emotion Regulatory Properties of Mindfulness: An Electrophysiological Investigation.

Authors:  Yanli Lin; Megan E Fisher; Sean M M Roberts; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.