Literature DB >> 22141748

Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.

Klaus Oberauer1, Simon Farrell, Christopher Jarrold, Kazimir Pasiecznik, Martin Greaves.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined the effect of phonological similarity between items and distractors on complex span performance. Item-distractor similarity benefited serial recall when distractors followed the items they were similar to, but not when distractors preceded the items they were similar to. These findings are predicted by C-SOB (contextual serial order in a box), a computational model of complex span. The model assumes that distractors are involuntarily encoded into memory, being associated to the preceding item's list position. Distractors interfere with items by superposition of distributed representations that are associated to the same position. Superposition distorts item memory; this distortion is less severe when the distractor is similar to the item. Further support for the assumption that distractors are encoded at the position of the preceding item comes from the finding that intrusions of distractors at recall tended to come from the position of the target item. In addition, intruding distractors tend to replace items to which they are similar, showing that lack of distinctiveness also contributes to interference. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22141748     DOI: 10.1037/a0026337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Overwriting and intrusion in short-term memory.

Authors:  Tyler D Bancroft; Jeffery A Jones; Tyler M Ensor; William E Hockley; Philip Servos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

3.  The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Timothy Jones; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

4.  Working memory is updated by reallocation of resources from obsolete to new items.

Authors:  Robert Taylor; Ivan Tomić; David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  The influences of working memory representations on long-range regression in text reading: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Teppei Tanaka; Masashi Sugimoto; Yuki Tanida; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Examining distinct working memory processes in children and adolescents using fMRI: Results and validation of a modified Brown-Peterson paradigm.

Authors:  Vanessa Siffredi; Pierre Barrouillet; Megan Spencer-Smith; Maarten Vaessen; Vicki Anderson; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference.

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  Working Memory Capacity Limits Memory for Bindings.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-09-19

9.  The effects of verbal and spatial memory load on children's processing speed.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Lauren V Hadley; Frances Buttelmann; Tanja Könen; Julie-Anne Meaney; Bonnie Auyeung; Julia Karbach; Nicolas Chevalier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Working memory training: from metaphors to models.

Authors:  Sergio Morra; Erika Borella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.