Literature DB >> 22141379

Surgical nurses' perceptions of ethical dilemmas, moral distress and quality of care.

Freda DeKeyser Ganz1, Keren Berkovitz.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe surgical nurses' perceived levels of ethical dilemmas, moral distress and perceived quality of care and the associations among them.
BACKGROUND: Nurses are committed to providing quality care. They can experience ethical dilemmas and moral distress while providing patient care. Little research has focused on the effect of moral distress or ethical dilemmas on perceived quality of care.
DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
METHOD: After administration and institutional Research Ethics Committee approval, a researcher requested 119 surgical nurses working in two Israeli hospitals to fill out three questionnaires (personal background characteristics; Ethical Dilemmas in Nursing and Quality of Nursing Care). Data collection took place from August 2007 to January 2008.
RESULTS: Participant mean age was 39·7 years. The sample consisted mostly of women, Jewish and married staff nurses. The majority of nurses reported low to moderate levels of ethical dilemma frequency but intermediate levels of ethical dilemma intensity. Frequency of ethical dilemmas was negatively correlated with level of nursing skill, meeting patient's needs and total quality of care. No important correlations were found between intensity of ethical dilemmas and quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Levels of ethical dilemma frequency were higher than intensity. Nurses tended to be satisfied with their level of quality of care. Increased frequency of ethical dilemmas was associated with some aspects of perceived quality of care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Quality of care is related to ethical dilemmas and moral distress among surgical nurses. Therefore, efforts should be made to decrease the frequency of these feelings to improve the quality of patient care.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22141379     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05897.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  Nurses' responses to initial moral distress in long-term care.

Authors:  Marie P Edwards; Susan E McClement; Laurie R Read
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Correlates of turnover intention among nursing staff in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katharina Herta Tolksdorf; Ulla Tischler; Katherina Heinrichs
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Professionalism dilemmas, moral distress and the healthcare student: insights from two online UK-wide questionnaire studies.

Authors:  Lynn V Monrouxe; Charlotte E Rees; Ian Dennis; Stephanie E Wells
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The medical futility experience of nursing professionals in Greece.

Authors:  Polychronis Voultsos; Anna Tsompanian; Alexandra K Tsaroucha
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  The Relationship Between Nurses' Ethical Reasoning with the Quality of Nursing Care.

Authors:  Firouzeh Safavi; Zhila Yousefi; Solmaz Mansour Bavani; Esmail Khodadadi
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2022-07-26

6.  Nurses' ethical decision-making during end of life care in South Korea: a cross-sectional descriptive survey.

Authors:  Arum Lim; Sanghee Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.