Literature DB >> 22141206

Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.

Lidija Bilić-Zulle1.   

Abstract

The comparison of methods experiment is important part in process of analytical methods and instruments validation. Passing and Bablok regression analysis is a statistical procedure that allows valuable estimation of analytical methods agreement and possible systematic bias between them. It is robust, non-parametric, non sensitive to distribution of errors and data outliers. Assumptions for proper application of Passing and Bablok regression are continuously distributed data and linear relationship between data measured by two analytical methods. Results are presented with scatter diagram and regression line, and regression equation where intercept represents constant and slope proportional measurement error. Confidence intervals of 95% of intercept and slope explain if their value differ from value zero (intercept) and value one (slope) only by chance, allowing conclusion of method agreement and correction action if necessary. Residual plot revealed outliers and identify possible non-linearity. Furthermore, cumulative sum linearity test is performed to investigate possible significant deviation from linearity between two sets of data. Non linear samples are not suitable for concluding on method agreement.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22141206     DOI: 10.11613/bm.2011.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)        ISSN: 1330-0962            Impact factor:   2.313


  59 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance: is phonocardiogram gating reliable in velocity-encoded phase contrast imaging?

Authors:  Kai Nassenstein; Stephan Orzada; Lars Haering; Andreas Czylwik; Christoph Jensen; Thomas Schlosser; Oliver Bruder; Mark E Ladd; Stefan Maderwald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Agreement of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting.

Authors:  Anna Flo Forner; Elham Hasheminejad; Sergi Sabate; Michael A Ackermann; Edwin W Turton; Joerg Ender
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Evaluation of three commercial varicella-zoster virus IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in comparison to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test.

Authors:  Andreas Sauerbrei; Anna Schäfler; Jörg Hofmann; Michael Schacke; Bernd Gruhn; Peter Wutzler
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-06-20

4.  The steroid response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation in men with Klinefelter syndrome does not change using immunoassay or mass spectrometry.

Authors:  L Roli; D Santi; S Belli; S Tagliavini; S Cavalieri; M C De Santis; E Baraldi; F Fanelli; M Mezzullo; A R Granata; U Pagotto; R Pasquali; V Rochira; C Carani; M Simoni; T Trenti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Comparison between bone alkaline phosphatase immunoassay and electrophoresis technique in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Neda Milinković; Marija Sarić-Matutinović; Svetlana Pejanović; Svetlana Ignjatović
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Comparison of Two Methods for Determination of NGAL Levels in Urine: ELISA and CMIA.

Authors:  E Krzeminska; A Wyczalkowska-Tomasik; N Korytowska; L Paczek
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Systematic Differences Between Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: Comparison Using Passing and Bablok Regression.

Authors:  Nafija Serdarevic; Pradeep Dabla; Adina Elena Stanciu
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2019-02-13

8.  Comparison of SimoaTM and EllaTM to assess serum neurofilament-light chain in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Audrey Gauthier; Sébastien Viel; Magali Perret; Guillaume Brocard; Romain Casey; Christine Lombard; Sabine Laurent-Chabalier; Marc Debouverie; Gilles Edan; Sandra Vukusic; Christine Lebrun-Frénay; Jérôme De Sèze; David Axel Laplaud; Giovanni Castelnovo; Olivier Gout; Aurélie Ruet; Thibault Moreau; Olivier Casez; Pierre Clavelou; Eric Berger; Hélène Zephir; Sophie Trouillet-Assant; Eric Thouvenot
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.511

9.  Comparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for cerebrospinal fluid measurement of amyloid β1-42 and total tau.

Authors:  Mirjana Babić; Zeljka Vogrinc; Andrea Diana; Nataša Klepac; Fran Borovečki; Patrick R Hof; Goran Simić
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.757

10.  Parathyroid Hormone Concentrations in Maintenance Hemodialysis: Longitudinal Evaluation of Intact and Biointact Assays.

Authors:  Carolin Berner; Rodrig Marculescu; Florian Frommlet; Amelie Kurnikowski; Benjamin Schairer; Christof Aigner; Christian Bieglmayer; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2021-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.