| Literature DB >> 22140538 |
Guido Lopes Dos Santos Santiago1, Piet Cools, Hans Verstraelen, Marijke Trog, Griet Missine, Nabil El Aila, Rita Verhelst, Inge Tency, Geert Claeys, Marleen Temmerman, Mario Vaneechoutte.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the vaginal microflora (VMF) has been well studied, information on the fluctuation of the different bacterial species throughout the menstrual cycle and the information on events preceding the presence of disturbed VMF is still very limited. Documenting the dynamics of the VMF during the menstrual cycle might provide better insights. In this study, we assessed the presence of different Lactobacillus species in relation to the BV associated species during the menstrual cycle, assessed the influence of the menstrual cycle on the different categories of vaginal microflora and assessed possible causes, such as menstruation and sexual intercourse, of VMF disturbance. To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study in which swabs and Gram stains were available for each day of two consecutive menstrual cycles, whereby 8 grades of VMF were distinguished by Gram stain analysis, and whereby the swabs were cultured every 7(th) day and identification of the bacterial isolates was carried out with a molecular technique.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22140538 PMCID: PMC3227645 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Chronology of the VMF grades for each subject during two menstrual cycles (see also Figure 1 for details).
| Subject | Age (years) | Screening | Start | M1 | Midcycle | M2 | Midcycle | M3 | Midcycle | End | |
|
| 2 | 28 | Ia | Ia | Ia + GPC→ Iab | Ia → Iab | Iab → II | Iab ↔ II | NA | NA | Iab |
| 5 | 24 | Ia | Ia | Ia→ IV → Ib + GPC | Ia→Iab→I-like→Ia | Ia→IV | III→II→Ia↔Iab | NA | NA | Iab | |
| 12 | 26 | Ia | Ia | Ia + GPC→ II | II →Ia | Ia + GPC | II →Iab → Ia | NA | NA | Ia | |
| 14 | 32 | Ia | M1 | Ia + GPC | Ia | Ia + GPC | Ia | Ia + GPC | NA | Ia | |
| 15 | 23 | Ia | Ia | Ia (No menses) | Ia | ||||||
| 6 | 25 | Ia | Iab + Y | II | II+Y→I-like↔Iab↔Ia +Y | I-like →II | Ia + Y | NA | NA | Ia | |
| 22 | 24 | Ia | Iab + Y | Iab+Y →II+Y→I-like + Y | Iab+Y→Ia↔Iab →Ia+Y↔Iab+Y | Iab+GPC↔II | Iab+Y↔Ia+Y→II+Y | NA | NA | Ia | |
| 4 | 20 | I-like | Ib | Ia+GPC→II | Ib | Ib→II | II→Ib | NA | NA | Iab | |
| 20 | 34 | Ib | Ib | Iab → IV →Iab +GPC | Ib →I-like →Iab | Iab+GPC →II →III →IV →0 | II →Iab →Ib | NA | NA | Ib | |
|
| 16 | 26 | Ib +Y | Ib +Y | I-like + Y →0 →IV | IV+Y →III+Y →I-like+Y | I-like+Y →I-like | I-like+Y | NA | NA | I-like +Y |
| 13 | 22 | Ib | IV | IV | Ib ↔ IV ↔ II | IV → II → IV | IV↔ Ib↔ II | NA | NA | Ib | |
| 19 | 22 | Ia | I-like | IV | IV | I-like | III→IV→Ib→IV | NA | NA | IV | |
| 25 | 18 | II | M1 | Ib | Ib+Y→II+Y→III+Y | III | III→II+Y | III→III+Y | III+Y→II+Y | II+Y | |
| 18 | 29 | II | II | II | II | II | II→Ia→II | NA | NA | Ia | |
| 21 | 32 | II | M1 | II | III ↔II →0→0+Y→II+Y→III+Y | Ib+GPC→II | II→Ib↔ Iab | Ia→II | NA | II | |
| 9 | 33 | II | III+Y | III | III | III | III | III | NA | III | |
| 24 | 19 | III | M1 | III | III | III | III | NA | NA | III | |
Legend: GPC: Gram positive cocci, Y: Yeast; NA: Not applicable, →: changing from grade indicated on the left to grade indicated on the right; ↔: changing back and from between both grades.
Figure 1Overview of VMF grades, yeasts, menstrual periods, sexual intercourse and antibiotic usage for the 17 participants.
Legend: 1A: grade Ia; 1B: grade Ib; 1AB: grade Iab; 1-L: grade I-like; 2: grade II; 3: grade III; 4: grade IV.
Figure 2Percentages of vaginal swabs, culture positive for lactobacilli, gram positive cocci (GPC) and other species for different VMF grades.
Species found in at least 4 cultured samples during the course of 2 MCs, with indication of their presence in the VMF of groups N and D.
| Species cultured | Ia | Iab | Ib | I-like | IV | II | III | 0 | N (9)/D (8) | Present during menses (N/D) |
|
| D | 0/1 | 0/Y | |||||||
|
| N | 1/0 | No menses | |||||||
|
| D | N/D | D | D | 1/2 | Y/Y | ||||
|
| D | D | 0/1 | 0/Y | ||||||
|
| D | 0/2 | 0/Y | |||||||
|
| D | 0/1 | 0/N | |||||||
|
| N | N | N | N | 1/0 | Y/0 | ||||
|
| D | D | D | D | D | D | 0/2 | 0/Y | ||
|
| D | D | D | D | D | 0/2 | 0/Y | |||
|
| N | N | D | D | D | D | 1/6 | Y/Y | ||
|
| D | D | D | D | 0/1 | 0/N | ||||
|
| N | 1/0 | No menses | |||||||
|
| N | N | N/D | N | N | N/D | D | 7/2 | Y/N | |
|
| N/D | N | N/D | D | N/D | 2/2 | Y/Y | |||
|
| N | N | N/D | D | D | D | 2/5 | N/Y | ||
|
| N | N | N | N | N/D | N/D | 6/1 | Y/Y | ||
|
| N | N/D | D | D | 2/2 | N/N | ||||
|
| N | D | N/D | D | 1/3 | Y/Y | ||||
|
| N/D | N | N/D | N | N/D | N/D | D | 6/5 | Y/Y | |
|
| N | N | 1/0 | N/0 | ||||||
|
| D | D | 0/1 | 0/Y | ||||||
|
| D | D | 0/2 | 0/Y | ||||||
|
| N | 1/0 | Y/0 | |||||||
|
| N | N | N | 1/0 | Y/0 | |||||
|
| N | N | D | D | N/D | N/D | D | 3/6 | Y/Y | |
|
| D | D | D | 0/1 | 0/Y | |||||
|
| N | N | N/D | N/D | 3/1 | Y/Y | ||||
|
| D | 0/1 | 0/N |
Legend:
D: Present only in group D (women with non-grade I VMF)
N: Present only in group N (women with grade I VMF)
N/D: Present in both groups N & D
Y: yes; N: no; 0: no women of this group with this species
Figure 3Percentages of vaginal swabs, culture positive for species present in at least 10% of the 29 samples collected during menstruation.
Legend: Red: percentage of 29 menstrual samples culture positive for this species.Blue: percentage of 149 intermenstrual samples culture positive for this species.