| Literature DB >> 22140509 |
Rengasamy Ramamoorthy1, Shu-Ye Jiang, Srinivasan Ramachandran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant cytochromes P450 are involved in a wide range of biosynthetic reactions and play various roles in plant development. However, little is known about the biological functions of the subfamily CYP96 in plants. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22140509 PMCID: PMC3225389 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Phenotypic characterization of oscyp96B4 as a dwarf mutant.
(A) and (B) Three-week old seedlings and mature plants of WT (left) and oscyp96b4 (right), respectively. (C) Detailed measurement of plant heights at both stages in WT (left) and oscyp96b4 (right). These stages include five-leaf stage (three week old) and mature stage (three month old). (D) Cryo-SEM images of 2nd leaf sheath surface of WT (top) and oscyp96b4 (bottom). Bars = 100 μm. (E) to (G) show the results from the investigation on cell width (E), sheath length (F) and cell length (G). (H) and (I) show the effect of BR (H) and GA3 (I) on the plant height in WT (blue) and oscyp96b4 (pink). Asterisks in (F) and (G) indicate significant differences between WT and the mutant plants at P<0.05 by t-test.
Figure 2Defects of oscyp96B4 at the reproductive stage.
(A) Panicles in WT (top) and mutant (bottom). (B) Florets and seeds in WT (green) and mutant (blue). The symbols “**” indicate significant differences between WT and the mutant plants at P<0.01 by t-test. (C) Pollens stained with I2/KI in WT (left) and mutant (right). Starch can be stained by the I2/KI solution and the starch content in pollen grains can serve as an indicator of viability. (D) Germinated pollens in WT (left) and mutant (right). Germination rate of pollens in WT is higher than that in the mutant. (E) Pollen viability in WT and mutant. Bars in (C) and (D) = 50 μm.
Figure 3The genomic organization, structure and sequence analysis of OsCYP96B4 and its protein.
(A) Full-length cDNA of the OsCYP96B4 gene showing various regions and the Ds insertion position as indicated by the red arrow. (B) The OsCYP96B4 protein showing the P450 domain (from Pfam database search; http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/search.shtml) and the corresponding position of Ds insertion as indicated by the red arrow. (C) The tandemly duplicated 5 genes encoding the same class of P450 and their genome organization. The chromosome position of these genes were based on the release 6.1 of the Rice Pseudomolecules published by the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml). HG, hypothetical protein.
Figure 4Expression profiles of OsCYP96B4 in rice.
The expression analysis was carried out by RT-PCR (A) and was verified by Northern bloting (B) and qRT-PCR (C). In (A) to (C), YL, ML, YP, MP, YR and MR indicate young leaf, mature leaf, young panicle, mature panicle, young root and mature root, respective. (D) to (J) show the expression patterns based on the fluorescent analysis of the OsCYP96B4 promoter-GFP transgenic plants. In (D) to (I), left and right images were taken from WT and the OsCYP96B4 promoter-GFP transgenic plants, respectively. (D) Two-week old leaves; (E) Geminated seeds; (F) Stem nodes; (G) Roots from two-week old seedlings; (H) Florets from nonflowering panicles; (I) and (J) Opened florets.
Figure 5Double strand RNAi-mediated specific silencing of OsCYP96B4 in rice.
(A) Determination of T-DNA copy numbers by Southern blot hybridization. (B) Expression analysis by qRT-PCR in various transgenic plants. In (A) and (B), T1 indicates the transgenic plant with the empty T-DNA insertion as a control; D5, D6 and D10 indicate the double strand RNAi transgenic plants with single copy of T-DNA insertion. (C) Phenotypic characterization of three independent dsRNAi transgenic plants by compared with WT and mutant.
Figure 6Phenotypic analysis of transgenic plants by over- and ectopic expressing OsCYP96B4.
(A) Different patterns of T-DNA integration in transgenic plants harboring OsCYP96B4 driven by the maize ubiquitin promoter in WT (over-expression). (B) Bar diagrams showing the expression level of OsCYP96B4 in WT and three independent over-expression dwarf plants with single copy of T-DNA integration. The symbols “***” indicate significant differences in their expression level between WT and the transgenic plants at P<0.001 by t-test. (C) Phenotypic characterization of over-expression transgenic plants. O9, O11 and O12 showed severe dwarf phenotype in different transgenic plants. O13 shows that most of transgenic plants died after several months of growth. (D) Different patterns of T-DNA integration in transgenic plants harboring OsCYP96B4 driven by its own promoter in WT. (E) Bar diagrams showing the expression level of OsCYP96B4 in WT and three independent ectopic expression plants (E1, E2 and E4) as well as transgenic plants with the empty T-DNA integration (T2). The symbols “*”, “**” and “***” indicate significant differences in their expression level between WT and the transgenic plants at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively, by t-test. (F) Phenotypic characterization of ectopic expression transgenic plants by comparing with WT and T2 plants. In (A) and (D), the results are based on Southern blot hybridization.
Figure 7Heterologous ectopic-expression of OsCYP96B4 in S. pombe.
(A) A group of S. pombe cells expressing the vector control (left) and a magnified view of single vector control cell (right). (B) A group of cells showing ectopic expression of OsCYP96B4 in the yeast cells with chromosome segregation defect (left) and a magnified view of ‘cut’ phenotype. (C) The yeast cells ectopically expressing OsCYP96B4 show dumbbell shape. (D) Over-expression of OsCYP96B4 in the yeast is toxic to its cells. The left shows the control and the right is the overexpressor. (E) The effects of ectopic expression of OsCYP96B4 in the yeast on cell segregation. (F) An investigation of cell length and width of the S. pombe cells upon ectopic-expression of OsCYP96B4. Bars in (A) to (C) = 5 μm. The asterisk in (F) indicates the significant difference between the control and ectopic expression of OsCYP96B4 in yeast at P<0.05 by t-test.
Figure 8Differential lipid profiling between WT and oscyp96b4.
(A) to (E) indicated the amount of total plant glycolipids MGDG and DGD and their specific molecular species. (F) to (K) showed the amount of total membrane phospholipids PC, PE, PG, PI and PS as well as their specific species. (L) to (P) showed the amount of total minor membrane lipid metabolites PA, lysoPC, lysoPE and lysoPG as well as their specific species. Only the molecular species with significant differences in their amount between WT and oscyp96b4 are presented. The symbol “*” indicates the significant differences between WT and the Ds insertion mutant by the t-test statistic analysis at P<0.05. In (A) to (P), left and right columns indicate WT and oscyp96b4, respectively.