Literature DB >> 22140308

Effect of caffeine on the intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.

Peeyush Chandra1, Ajit Gaur, Shambhu Varma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Coffee and tea are very common nonalcoholic beverages. However, their intake, particularly that of coffee, has been suggested to increase intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open angle glaucoma/ocular hypertension. The causative agent has been suggested to be their caffeine content. The objective of this study was to determine if this represents a direct caffeine effect. This study was therefore done using pure caffeine applied directly to the eyes.
METHODS: The study was conducted with five human volunteers with open angle glaucoma/ ocular hypertension. IOP was measured using a Perkins applanation tonometer. Eye drops of 1% caffeine were prepared in-home. Following the initial (basal) measurement of the IOP, 50 μL of the eye drop preparation was instilled in the eye at 0-, 4-, and 6-hour intervals. IOPs were measured 30 minutes after each instillation. A second study was also undertaken following the first. In this study, the same patients instilled the eye drops three times per day for 1 week at home and then returned to the clinic on day 7. They were then again treated with caffeine eye drops as above and IOPs measured.
RESULTS: In the 1-day study, the mean basal IOP was 23.6 ± 2.80 mmHg. Thirty minutes after instillation of the drops as described, the pressures were 23.2 ± 1.93, 22.2 ± 1.99, and 22.6 ± 2.31. The basal reading was taken at 10 am and another reading was then taken at 10.30 am. Additional eye drops were instilled at 2 and 8 pm and readings taken 30 minutes after each instillation. In the 1 week study, the basal value was 22.6 ± 2.32. After instillation of the drops as above the values were 23 ± 2.16, 22.4 ± 2.27, and 23 ± 1.94.
CONCLUSION: Administration of caffeine into the eyes of patients did not have any effect on IOP and it remained relatively unchanged. This was true in the 1-day study as well as in the 1-week study. A cumulative effect was not visible. The results therefore demonstrate that caffeine has no significant effect on IOP in patients with glaucoma. Any effects reported in coffee drinkers may therefore be related to other constituents in coffee, known to be generated pyrolytically from endogenous constituents of coffee beans by roasting at relatively high temperature, combined with the osmotic effects imposed by adequate fluid intake, known to be common in glaucoma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caffeine; intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; open angle glaucoma

Year:  2011        PMID: 22140308      PMCID: PMC3225459          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S25291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


Introduction

Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is a significant ingredient in several common beverages such as coffee, tea, and colas, as well as in various other food items such as cakes and candies. A regular cup of coffee (236 mL) contains 135–150 mg of caffeine.1 On average, daily consumption from normal coffee drinking alone is over 200 mg per day, although amounts up to 400 mg per day have been reported from certain European countries.2,3 Such amounts of caffeine are known to exert several physiological effects such as stimulation of the central nervous system (CNS), cardiac excitation, relaxation of bronchial and vascular smooth muscles, and promotion of diuresis and intestinal motility.4,5 Although most of these caffeine effects are ultimately related to its effect of increasing levels of cytosolic calcium ions, the specific mechanisms involved and the magnitude of the physiological effects differ from one tissue to another. Stimulation of the CNS, for example, is attributed to a competitive blockade of the adenosine receptors situated at the presynaptic nerve terminals.6–9 This is due to the structural similarities between adenosine and caffeine, both purine derivatives. Since the binding of adenosine to its receptor regulates the voltage-gated calcium channels, blockade of these receptors results in an increased influx of calcium from the extracellular milieu into the cell cytosol, causing an increase in the synaptic release of neurotransmitters, including acetylcholine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and others involved in neural transduction and cardiovascular stimulation.9–11 The stimulation of cardiac muscle contraction by caffeine12–14 has been attributed to its binding with ryanodine-sensitive Ca++ channels in the sarcoplasmic reticulum15–18 and consequent release of the sequestered Ca++ into the cytosol. In turn, the increased cytosolic Ca++ stimulates muscle contraction via interaction with the actomyosin complex. The vasodilatory effect of Ca++ is exerted through Ca++-dependent activation of nitric oxide synthase, resulting in the elevation of nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels.19 Caffeine also has several metabolic effects20–23 exerted through an inhibition of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (c-AMP) phosphodiesterase24 leading to an enhancement of c-AMP levels in the cells. In summary, most of the neural and extraneural effects of caffeine are exerted through its action on intracellular levels of free calcium and inhibition of phosphodiesterase. However, several recent biochemical studies demonstrate that it is also an effective scavenger of reactive oxygen species, including the hydroxyl radical OH•.25–33 The product of such a reaction is the formation of the 8-oxo derivative of caffeine, known as N-trimethyl urate. However, direct generation of OH• in vivo is a rarity. Usually it takes place by the interaction of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide, which by themselves are potent oxidants, detoxified normally by superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. The generation of OH• is hence greatly minimized in most tissues, except in the cases of the eye and the skin where its generation remains consistent via several photochemical reactions.29 Studies on the pathophysiological effects of caffeine in the eye are still very limited. However, coffee drinking has been suggested to cause a transient elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma. The magnitude of such pressure elevation ranges from 1 to 2 mmHg, an hour after drinking coffee.34–37 The significance of this relatively small elevation in the face of a normal IOP of 14–22 mmHg remains unsure, especially in view of a number of studies that have found no such effect.38–40 In fact, it is well known that such increases can take place just by drinking equivalent amounts of water, ranging from 250 to 1000 mL.41–47 That normal coffee drinking is not associated with an effect on IOP has been shown also by a large cohort study.48 Further, it should be pointed out that coffee is not analogous to caffeine,49 the former being a complex mixture of compounds containing several other physiologically active compounds such as furfurals and acrolein. Information about the effect of caffeine per se on IOP in patients with glaucoma/ocular hypertension is not yet available, except for one study where oral administration of caffeine was found to be ineffective in raising IOP.50 However, such studies are still lacking in glaucoma patients, who are known to have significant alterations in aqueous dynamics and IOP. The effect of a continued supply of caffeine to the aqueous humor also remains to be studied to determine whether there are any cumulative effects. A study of the effects of direct topical application of caffeine on IOP in patients with glaucoma was thus desirable, especially in view of the many recent observations strongly suggesting that the compound has significant positive health effects such as the prevention of diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s-like diseases,51–58 and inhibition of the onset of diabetes.59,60 This study was therefore undertaken to determine the effect of caffeine on IOP in patients with glaucoma/ ocular hypertension, using direct topical administration of pure caffeine via eye drops, eliminating the possibility of indirect metabolic effects. Contrary to expectations based on earlier observations of coffee drinking in relation to IOP in glaucoma patients, the results of this study indicate that direct application of caffeine to the eye does not exert any effect on IOP. This applied both in studies done within hours of caffeine instillation in the eye and when patients were treated consecutively 3 times a day for 6 days followed by another treatment on day 7. The authors’ studies suggest no reason for caution in the use of caffeine in patients with open angle glaucoma, as similar small increases in IOP can be generated by water-drinking as seen in a provocative test for glaucoma. This is attributable to changes in body fluid osmotic dynamics.

Materials and methods

A 1% caffeine eye drop preparation was made by dissolving 100 mg of caffeine (Sigma Aldrich catalogue number 58082; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO) in 10 mL of sterile teardrop solution (0.3% hydroxyl-propyl methyl cellulose) (Sigma Aldrich) at room temperature. The solution was then divided, using sterile techniques, into 1 mL portions in eye drop vials and refrigerated. IOP was determined using a Perkins applanation tonometer (Clement Clarke Perkins MK-II; Clement Clarke International, Harlow, UK) after application of procaine/fluorescein eye drops (Smarth Life Sciences Nalagarh, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India). The five volunteers selected for the study were diagnosed to have primary open angle glaucoma/ocular hypertension. The age of the patients varied from 40 to 65 years. The group mean IOP was 23.6 ± 2.8 mmHg. They had not had any ocular surgical procedures such as cataract extraction or laser photocoagulation treatment for retinopathy. Basal intraocular pressures were taken at 10.00 am and labeled “A.” Immediately following, the caffeine eye drop preparation was instilled (50 μL) and the eye closed for proper mixing of the drop in the conjunctival cul-de-sac. An IOP measurement was then taken at 10.30 am (labeled “B”). Additional eye drops were then instilled in the respective eyes at 2 and 8 pm and IOP measured again 30 minutes after each instillation, that is, at 2.30 (C) and 8.30 pm (D), respectively. Thus, the total number of IOP measurements on each eye was four, including the initial basal reading. Blood pressures were taken at the beginning and at the end of the investigation, with no substantial change revealed. Subsequently, the patients were asked to instill the eye drops three times daily at the above times for 6 days and then return to the clinic on day 7. The above schedule of drop instillation and IOP measurements was then repeated. The patients were then withdrawn from the study and started on antiglaucoma medications.

Results

The initial mean IOP level in the volunteers prior to caffeine drop instillation was 23.6 ± 2.8 mmHg. The levels 30 minutes after each subsequent treatment were 23.2 ± 1.93, 22.2 ± 1.99, and 22.6 ± 2.31 mmHg, respectively. As summarized in Figure 1, no significant effect from the caffeine drops was noticeable. Repeated drop instillation did not show any enhancement of IOP. Blood pressure levels also remained unaffected. The results of the initial 1-day study were statistically analyzed and are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1

The bars represent the intraocular pressure of patients given caffeine eye drops as described for Table 1 (the 1-day study).

Notes: The times indicated sequentially represent measurements A to D. The extended lines on the bar represent standard deviations.

Table 1

Effect of caffeine eye drops on intraocular pressure: 1-day treatment study

ABCD
Mean IOP23.623.222.222.6
Standard deviation2.81.931.992.31
t with A reference0.371.30.87
Variance (p)/A*0.710.210.4

Notes: (A) represents the basal IOPs (mmHg). (B) represents the values soon after the first treatment. To look for a possible cumulative effect, eye drop instillation was repeated after 4 hours (C) and 6 hours (D) and IOP determined 30 minutes after each administration. The total number of eyes was ten, using the right as well the left eyes of five subjects. Contralateral difference was 1.4 ± 0.69 mmHg.

Variance (p) of the IOPs under B, C, and D with referece to the IOP under A, based on the corresponding t values indicated above.

Abbreviation: IOP, intraocular pressure.

To examine the possibility of any long-term effect of caffeine administration, the above study was extended by asking the patients to use the caffeine drops 3 times a day for 6 additional days, as per schedule used during the initial 1-day study, and return to the clinical on day 7 for further pressure measurements. On their return, the patients did not report any unwanted effects except for a general feeling of well-being. Measurement of IOP and caffeine administration was repeated on return as above. The results of this second investigation were statistically analyzed and are summarized in Table 2 (see also Figure 2, a bar diagram for easier comprehension). “A” represents the basal readings obtained without any further treatment with the caffeine eye drops. “B,” “C,” and “D” represent the data after caffeine administration as described above for the 1-day investigation. Contrary to expectations, no increase or decrease of IOP was noticed even in this study. The individual basal readings, as well as those determined 30 minutes after administering the drops, remained essentially unchanged. The reading in the group before administration of any drops was 22.6 ± 2.32 mmHg. This was similar to that obtained in the 1-day experiment, which was 23.6 ± 2.8. Subsequent readings at the above time points were 23, 22.4, and 23 mmHg, respectively, indicating no change in IOP after caffeine drop treatment.
Table 2

Effect of caffeine eye drops on intraocular pressure: 1-week study

GroupsABCD
Mean IOP22.623.022.423.0
Standard deviation2.322.162.271.94
t with A reference0.390.190.48
Variance (p)/A0.690.850.68

Note: After 6 days of 3 times daily application, the procedure described in Table 1 was repeated with identical times of drop instillation and IOP measurements. The total number of eyes remained at ten, using the right as well the left eyes of five subjects. Contralateral difference was 1.3 ± 0.99 mmHg.

Figure 2

The bars represent the intraocular pressure on patients given caffeine eye drops as described under Table 2, (the 1 week study).

Notes: The times indicated sequentially represent measurements A to D. The extended lines on the bar represent standard deviations.

Discussion

Caffeine is widely present in various beverages and food items. Medically, it is frequently used as a CNS stimulant and for treating asthma and apnea, the latter primarily in preterm infants.4 The US Food and Drug Administration lists this compound as generally safe for human consumption, the median lethal dose being high (10–15 g in a single dose), which is equivalent to 80–100 cups of coffee. Achieving lethality is difficult. Additionally, regular use of this compound, mostly from coffee or other common beverages, has been reported to provide several very significant health benefits such as reduced incidence of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases,51–56 senile dementia, and prevention of neural degeneration in general which is associated with loss of cognitive performance.57,58 Recent reports also suggest that caffeine decreases the risk of development of type 2 diabetes,59,60 loss of liver function and cirrhosis,61,62 and development of certain cancers.63–68 Previous reports suggesting an association between regular use of caffeine and development of hypertension have been significantly toned down in view of recent epidemiological findings.69 The association between hypertension and coffee intake could not be established in a study based on at least 155,000 nurses.70 A Harvard study of 128,000 people concluded that coffee consumption is not associated with coronary heart disease unless it is used in combination with cigarette smoking and excessive use of alcohol. These and many other positive reports, including caffeine’s biochemical properties of scavenging reactive oxygen species, strongly suggest the desirability of further studies regarding its effect on the pathophysiology of ocular diseases. Based on earlier suggestions of possible transient increase in blood pressure caused by caffeine in persons who are not habitual users,4 it was speculated that the caffeine present in coffee might also increase IOP, as a hemodynamic effect. A transient increase of 1–2 mmHg pressure following coffee drinking has indeed been found to be the case in some reports34–36 but not in others.37–40 The pathophysiological significance of such a small change, if true, remains to be established. Coffee is not analogous to caffeine.49 Therefore, attributing the effects of coffee drinking on IOP elevation solely to coffee’s caffeine content may be misleading, because coffee contains several other physiologically active substances derived from the coffee beans endogenously, as well as those produced during its processing by roasting and the preparation of the drink itself. Roasted coffee beans are known to contain several bioactive ingredients such as furfural and its derivatives, formaldehyde, and acrolein,71,72 just to mention a few that are all known to be toxic to the eye.73 Their concentrations also differ. It is therefore difficult to exclude the possibility that variation in the levels of these constituents in different coffee brands and preparations might have been responsible for the differences in results reported on IOP in coffee-drinking patients. This limitation applies even in studies where tea, with lower amounts of caffeine (<3 mg), was used as a control. Its composition is very different to that of coffee beans. It was therefore necessary to investigate the effect of caffeine on IOP in glaucoma patients by topical application of the chemically pure compound. Additional studies were also considered important because several recent studies suggest that caffeine appears beneficial to ocular tissues by protecting them against OH• radical-induced oxidative stress. In addition, caffeine can support the tissues metabolically by inhibiting c-AMP phosphodiesterase and thereby maintaining c-AMP levels.74–76 Caffeine’s effect in boosting body ergonomics and memory is now well accepted. The observed ineffectiveness of caffeine in elevating IOP is not due to any lower doses than can be derived from drinking coffee. The amount used was much higher than that achievable by coffee drinking. The peak plasma level of caffeine following coffee drinking, 1 hour after consumption, varies from 3 to 12 mg/L.77 Being freely diffusible, this level will be similar in intraocular fluids including the aqueous humor. The initial amount of caffeine instilled in the eyes in these experiments was 0.5 mg present in 50 μL of the drop preparation. On closing the eye after instillation, most of it leaked out through the palpebral fissure and nasolacrimal pathway, so about 8–10 μL was retained in the conjunctival sac. Hence, at maximum, a bolus of 0.1 mg of caffeine remains available to equilibrate with the aqueous, with the instant theoretical level of 0.5 mg/mL, (4.5 mM), taking the aqueous volume to be <0.2 mL. Topical instillation of such caffeine drops elevates the aqueous level significantly, as predicted above and as has been shown previously in experiments with rats.78 In summary, therefore, studies with pure caffeine convincingly demonstrate that caffeine does not have any significant effect on IOP in patients with glaucoma/ocular hypertension, as is the case in humans without glaucoma/ ocular hypertension given oral doses of caffeine.50
  62 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE ON MAMMALIAN ATRIAL MUSCLE, AND ITS INTERACTION WITH ADENOSINE AND CALCIUM.

Authors:  T DEGUBAREFF; W SLEATOR
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Influence of coffee drinking on subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Manami Inoue; Itsuro Yoshimi; Tomotaka Sobue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Adenosine receptors in the central nervous system: relationship to the central actions of methylxanthines.

Authors:  J W Daly; R F Bruns; S H Snyder
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1981-05-11       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 4.  The pharmacology of caffeine.

Authors:  M J Arnaud
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1987

5.  Coffee, cirrhosis, and transaminase enzymes.

Authors:  Arthur L Klatsky; Cynthia Morton; Natalia Udaltsova; Gary D Friedman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-06-12

6.  Caffeine increases exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during exercise.

Authors:  Sophie E Yeo; Roy L P G Jentjens; Gareth A Wallis; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-04-14

7.  Ca-releasing action of beta, gamma-methylene adenosine triphosphate on fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Y Ogawa; S Ebashi
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  Activation of the Ca2+ release channel of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum by caffeine and related compounds.

Authors:  E Rousseau; J Ladine; Q Y Liu; G Meissner
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Methylxanthine effects on caudate dopamine release as measured by in vivo electrochemistry.

Authors:  M E Morgan; R E Vestal
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.037

10.  Risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: a prospective analysis from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

Authors:  Joan Lindsay; Danielle Laurin; René Verreault; Réjean Hébert; Barbara Helliwell; Gerry B Hill; Ian McDowell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  10 in total

1.  Adenosine receptor distribution in Rhesus monkey ocular tissue.

Authors:  Krista M Beach; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Earl L Smith; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Effects of caffeinated coffee consumption on intraocular pressure, ocular perfusion pressure, and ocular pulse amplitude: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Z Jiwani; D J Rhee; S C Brauner; M F Gardiner; T C Chen; L Q Shen; S H Chen; C L Grosskreutz; K K Chang; C E Kloek; S H Greenstein; S Borboli-Gerogiannis; D L Pasquale; S Chaudhry; S Loomis; J L Wiggs; L R Pasquale; A V Turalba
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Caffeine eye drops protect against UV-B cataract.

Authors:  Martin Kronschläger; Stefan Löfgren; Zhaohua Yu; Nooshin Talebizadeh; Shambhu D Varma; Per Söderberg
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 4.  Caffeine and Its Neuroprotective Role in Ischemic Events: A Mechanism Dependent on Adenosine Receptors.

Authors:  R Brito; K C Calaza; D Pereira-Figueiredo; A A Nascimento; M C Cunha-Rodrigues
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.046

5.  Topically instilled caffeine selectively alters emmetropizing responses in infant rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Zhihui She; Krista Beach; Lisa A Ostrin; Monica Jong
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Caffeine administration prevents retinal neuroinflammation and loss of retinal ganglion cells in an animal model of glaucoma.

Authors:  Maria H Madeira; Arturo Ortin-Martinez; Francisco Nadal-Nícolas; António F Ambrósio; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; Marta Agudo-Barriuso; Ana Raquel Santiago
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effect of coffee (caffeine) against human cataract blindness.

Authors:  Shambhu D Varma
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-27

8.  The acute effects of single cup of coffee on ocular biometric parameters in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Feyzahan Uzun; Mehmet Gökhan Aslan; Kamile Öter; Muhammet Kaim
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-31

9.  Protective effect of caffeine against high sugar-induced transcription of microRNAs and consequent gene silencing: a study using lenses of galactosemic mice.

Authors:  Shambhu D Varma; Svitlana Kovtun
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 10.  Treatment of Glaucoma with Natural Products and Their Mechanism of Action: An Update.

Authors:  Ru Hui Sim; Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla; Srijit Das; Seong Lin Teoh
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.