BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse psychosocial factor exposures in the workplace for immigrant workers in Spain and identify differences in exposure at work between immigrants and Spaniards. METHODS: A multi-stage sample was taken by conglomerates (final sample size: 7555 workers). The information was obtained in 2004 and 2005 using a standardized questionnaire administered by interviewing participants in their homes. The analysis focused on eight psychosocial factors. For quantitative demands and insecurity, the exposure was defined according to the higher third, and for the others, the exposure was defined according to the lower third. The prevalence ratio (PR) and confidence interval (CI) for unfavourable psychosocial factor, both crude and adjusted, were calculated using log binomial models. RESULTS: Those with highest prevalence of unfavourable psychosocial factor were immigrant manual workers, particularly in low possibilities for development (PR=2.87; 95% CI 2.44-3.73), and immigrant women, particularly in low control over working times (PR=1.72; 95% CI 1.55-1.91). CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant workers with manual jobs and immigrant women are the groups most exposed to psychosocial factor. In efforts to prevent these exposures, these inequalities should be taken into account.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse psychosocial factor exposures in the workplace for immigrant workers in Spain and identify differences in exposure at work between immigrants and Spaniards. METHODS: A multi-stage sample was taken by conglomerates (final sample size: 7555 workers). The information was obtained in 2004 and 2005 using a standardized questionnaire administered by interviewing participants in their homes. The analysis focused on eight psychosocial factors. For quantitative demands and insecurity, the exposure was defined according to the higher third, and for the others, the exposure was defined according to the lower third. The prevalence ratio (PR) and confidence interval (CI) for unfavourable psychosocial factor, both crude and adjusted, were calculated using log binomial models. RESULTS: Those with highest prevalence of unfavourable psychosocial factor were immigrant manual workers, particularly in low possibilities for development (PR=2.87; 95% CI 2.44-3.73), and immigrant women, particularly in low control over working times (PR=1.72; 95% CI 1.55-1.91). CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant workers with manual jobs and immigrant women are the groups most exposed to psychosocial factor. In efforts to prevent these exposures, these inequalities should be taken into account.
Authors: T Sterud; T Tynes; I Sivesind Mehlum; K B Veiersted; B Bergbom; A Airila; B Johansson; M Brendler-Lindqvist; K Hviid; M-A Flyvholm Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alison Daly; Renee N Carey; Ellie Darcey; HuiJun Chih; Anthony D LaMontagne; Allison Milner; Alison Reid Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Xiaomin Liu; Steven J Bowe; Allison Milner; Lin Li; Lay San Too; Anthony D LaMontagne Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cecilia Arici; Elena Ronda-Pérez; Tishad Tamhid; Katsiaryna Absekava; Stefano Porru Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390