Literature DB >> 22139795

Estimation of treatment effect for the sequential parallel design.

Roy N Tamura1, Xiaohong Huang, Dennis D Boos.   

Abstract

The sequential parallel clinical trial is a novel clinical trial design being used in psychiatric diseases that are known to have potentially high placebo response rates. The design consists of an initial parallel trial of placebo versus drug augmented by a second parallel trial of placebo versus drug in the placebo non-responders from the initial trial. Statistical research on the design has focused on hypothesis tests. However, an equally important output from any clinical trial is the estimate of treatment effect and variability around that estimate. In the sequential parallel trial, the most important treatment effect is the effect in the overall population. This effect can be estimated by considering only the first phase of the trial, but this ignores useful information from the second phase of the trial. We develop estimates of treatment effect that incorporate data from both phases of the trial. Our simulations and a real data example suggest that there can be substantial gains in precision by incorporating data from both phases. The potential gains appear to be greatest in moderate-sized trials, which would typically be the case in phase II trials.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139795      PMCID: PMC3882761          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Frequency of positive studies among fixed and flexible dose antidepressant clinical trials: an analysis of the food and drug administration summary basis of approval reports.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Shirin R Khan; Gary Walens; Russell Kolts; Earl L Giller
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A Eden Evins; David J Dorer; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Sample size and the probability of a successful trial.

Authors:  Christy Chuang-Stein
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  An examination of the efficiency of the sequential parallel design in psychiatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Roy N Tamura; Xiaohong Huang
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Optimality, sample size, and power calculations for the sequential parallel comparison design.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Bahjat Qaqish; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Two-stage randomized trials: outstanding issues.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ella J Daly; Jaskaran B Singh; Maggie Fedgchin; Kimberly Cooper; Pilar Lim; Richard C Shelton; Michael E Thase; Andrew Winokur; Luc Van Nueten; Husseini Manji; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  An analysis of adaptive design variations on the sequential parallel comparison design for clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael Y Mi; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Design and analysis considerations for utilizing a mapping function in a small sample, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials with continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Holly Hartman; Roy N Tamura; Matthew J Schipper; Kelley M Kidwell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  On clinical trials with a high placebo response rate.

Authors:  George Y H Chi; Yihan Li; Yanning Liu; David Lewin; Pilar Lim
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2015-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.