Literature DB >> 22139448

Unrecognized visual field deficits in children with primary central nervous system brain tumors.

M J Harbert1, L A Yeh-Nayre, H S O'Halloran, M L Levy, J R Crawford.   

Abstract

Visual field deficits can be a consequence of brain tumor location or treatment. The prevalence of unrecognized visual field deficits in children diagnosed with brain tumors is not known. All children at a single tertiary care pediatric children's hospital diagnosed with a primary brain tumor were tested for visual field deficits by a child neurologist and neuro-ophthalmologist over 16 months. Children with reproducible visual field deficits on two separate occasions were included in the analysis. Patients with optic glioma, craniopharyngioma, or previously known visual field deficits were excluded. Fourteen of 92 (15.2%) children (average 8.9 years, 8 girls) had undiagnosed visual field deficits. Average time between diagnosis of tumor and unrecognized visual field deficit was 3.7 years (range 0-13 years). Unrecognized visual field deficits were not associated with age (P = 0.27) or gender (P = 0.38). Visual field deficits were attributed to direct tumor infiltration (n = 8), postoperative complications (n = 5) and post-radiation edema (n = 1). Deficits included bitemporal hemianopsia (n = 2), homonymous hemianopsia (n = 9), quadrantanopsia (n = 2), and concentric visual field loss (n = 1.) Tumor location included temporal lobe (n = 9), parietal lobe (n = 2), posterior fossa (n = 2), hypothalamic-chiasmatic (n = 2) and multifocal areas (n = 4). Children with temporal lobe tumors were more likely to have unrecognized visual field deficits (P = 0.004). In all 14 patients, visual field deficits were determined by examination only and were not reported by either the patient or caregiver regardless of age. The prevalence of unrecognized visual field deficits in children with brain tumors can be surprisingly high. Serial neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation of children with brain tumors is often required to diagnose a visual field deficit since patient or caregiver reporting may be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139448     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0774-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  6 in total

1.  Survival and long-term health and cognitive outcomes after low-grade glioma.

Authors:  Gregory T Armstrong; Heather M Conklin; Sujuan Huang; Deokumar Srivastava; Robert Sanford; David W Ellison; Thomas E Merchant; Melissa M Hudson; Mary Ellen Hoehn; Leslie L Robison; Amar Gajjar; E Brannon Morris
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Prevalence estimates for primary brain tumors in the United States by age, gender, behavior, and histology.

Authors:  Kimberly R Porter; Bridget J McCarthy; Sally Freels; Yoonsang Kim; Faith G Davis
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  [Ophthalmological findings in pediatric brain neoplasms: 58 cases].

Authors:  A Santamaría; R Martínez; I Astigarraga; J Etxebarría; M Sánchez
Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol       Date:  2008-08

4.  The presenting features of brain tumours: a review of 200 cases.

Authors:  S H Wilne; R C Ferris; A Nathwani; C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Signs and symptoms of patients with brain tumors presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  H Snyder; K Robinson; D Shah; R Brennan; M Handrigan
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Presentation of childhood CNS tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophie Wilne; Jacqueline Collier; Colin Kennedy; Karin Koller; Richard Grundy; David Walker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 41.316

  6 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Visual function in children with primary brain tumors.

Authors:  Jason H Peragallo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 2.  Effects of Brain Tumors on Vision in Children.

Authors:  Jason H Peragallo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2018

3.  Visual Outcomes, Visual Fields, and Optical Coherence Tomography in Paediatric Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Soraya Mediero; Susana Noval; Luciano Bravo-Ljubetic; Inés Contreras; Fernando Carceller
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-06-17

4.  Presentation and symptom interval in children with central nervous system tumors. A single-center experience.

Authors:  Chiara Stocco; Chiara Pilotto; Eva Passone; Agostino Nocerino; Raffaello Tosolini; Anna Pusiol; Paola Cogo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Atypical Giant Suprasellar Prolactinoma Presenting With Visual Field Changes in the Absence of Symptoms of Hyperprolactinemia.

Authors:  Scott Sun; Jun Q Mo; Michael L Levy; John Crawford
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-16

6.  Visual findings as primary manifestations in patients with intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Nazife Sefi-Yurdakul
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  The Need to Look for Visual Deficit After Stroke in Children.

Authors:  Judith Luckman; Sylvie Chokron; Shalom Michowiz; Eugenia Belenky; Helen Toledano; Alon Zahavi; Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Effects of visual search training in children with hemianopia.

Authors:  Iliya V Ivanov; Stephan Kuester; Manfred MacKeben; Anna Krumm; Manja Haaga; Martin Staudt; Angelika Cordey; Claudia Gehrlich; Peter Martus; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Conrad Schmoll; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Alastair G Wilkinson; Alan O Mulvihill; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.