BACKGROUND: Evaluation of left ventricular function (LV) is one of the most important tasks of echocardiography. Left ventricular longitudinal function has been recognized to differentiate myocardial disorders better than ejection fraction (EF) alone. But recent parameters are still dependent on image quality and time consuming. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, strain imaging and assessment of longitudinal function with a tissue motion annular displacement (TMAD) tracking algorithm were performed in 152 patients with various cardiac pathologies and 47 healthy volunteers in a clinical routine setting. RESULTS: Measures of longitudinal function such as LV peak systolic strain (SR, r² = 0.88, p < 0.001) and peak systolic strain rate (SRR, r² = 0.78, p < 0.001) correlated highly with TMAD. Tissue motion annular displacement was ultrafast and less time-consuming compared to strain imaging (8.2 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients with reduced image quality could be analyzed compared to strain imaging (p < 0.001). The intra- and inter-observer variabilities were very low with 1.3 ± 1% and 1.7 ± 1.2%. Tissue motion annular displacement correlated well with clinical parameters (NYHA, r = -0.71, p < 0.001) as well as NT-proBNP (r = -0.73, p < 0.001) and identified patients with structural heart disease with a significantly higher sensitivity 92.1% and specificity 95.7% than did EF, SR, SRR or NT-proBNP (Cut-off:14.2%, p < 0.01). In a subgroup of patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis and preserved EF (>50%, n = 54), TMAD was significantly reduced, especially in those without any signs of cardiac involvement and was superior to other parameters of longitudinal function (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue motion annular displacement is a rapid, sensitive and reproducible method for the assessment of LV longitudinal function, which is less dependent on image quality.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of left ventricular function (LV) is one of the most important tasks of echocardiography. Left ventricular longitudinal function has been recognized to differentiate myocardial disorders better than ejection fraction (EF) alone. But recent parameters are still dependent on image quality and time consuming. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, strain imaging and assessment of longitudinal function with a tissue motion annular displacement (TMAD) tracking algorithm were performed in 152 patients with various cardiac pathologies and 47 healthy volunteers in a clinical routine setting. RESULTS: Measures of longitudinal function such as LV peak systolic strain (SR, r² = 0.88, p < 0.001) and peak systolic strain rate (SRR, r² = 0.78, p < 0.001) correlated highly with TMAD. Tissue motion annular displacement was ultrafast and less time-consuming compared to strain imaging (8.2 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients with reduced image quality could be analyzed compared to strain imaging (p < 0.001). The intra- and inter-observer variabilities were very low with 1.3 ± 1% and 1.7 ± 1.2%. Tissue motion annular displacement correlated well with clinical parameters (NYHA, r = -0.71, p < 0.001) as well as NT-proBNP (r = -0.73, p < 0.001) and identified patients with structural heart disease with a significantly higher sensitivity 92.1% and specificity 95.7% than did EF, SR, SRR or NT-proBNP (Cut-off:14.2%, p < 0.01). In a subgroup of patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis and preserved EF (>50%, n = 54), TMAD was significantly reduced, especially in those without any signs of cardiac involvement and was superior to other parameters of longitudinal function (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue motion annular displacement is a rapid, sensitive and reproducible method for the assessment of LV longitudinal function, which is less dependent on image quality.
Authors: Mei Wang; Gabriel W K Yip; Angela Y M Wang; Yan Zhang; Pik Yuk Ho; Mui Kiu Tse; Peggo K W Lam; John E Sanderson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sebastian J Buss; David Wolf; Grigorios Korosoglou; Regina Max; Celine S Weiss; Christian Fischer; Dieter Schellberg; Christian Zugck; Helmut F Kuecherer; Hanns-Martin Lorenz; Hugo A Katus; Stefan E Hardt; Alexander Hansen Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Arnt V Kristen; Johannes Rinn; Ute Hegenbart; David Lindenmaier; Corina Merkle; Christoph Röcken; Stefan Hardt; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Na Li; Linbin Meng; Yichen Wang; Kailing Xiong; Junxuan He; Yang Wang; Yifu Qiao; Attila Nemes; Raffaele Giordano; Lang Qiao Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2018-06