Literature DB >> 22139117

Use of manual techniques for perineal support in Norwegian maternity departments.

Atle Fretheim1, Tom Tanbo, Siri Vangen, Liv Merete Reinar, John-Arne Røttingen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of supporting techniques to protect the perineum in the last phase of birth is controversial. The objective of this investigation was to gain more knowledge on the use of hand techniques for perineal support in Norwegian maternity wards. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A questionnaire investigation addressed to the leaders of all the country''s maternity wards.
RESULTS: We received answers from 39 of 47 maternity wards (83 %) 34 of the wards said that most of those who helped at birth used hand support. 27 wards said that there had been a change in practice, and nearly all of them thought that the changes had taken place during the last five years. 17 wards had written guidelines on the use of hand support techniques. Without exception, use of the hand support technique was recommended. Almost half the wards recommended a modified Ritgen's manoeuvre ("the Finnish manoeuvre") In many wards the choice of perineal support was left to the individual birth helper.
INTERPRETATION: Supporting techniques now seem to have become standard procedure in the great majority of Norwegian maternity wards. It is therefore difficult to carry out a comparative study between the use of hand manoeuvres and a passive approach. Further investigation should be carried out on whether the introduction of perineal support has had the desired effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139117     DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.11.0643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen        ISSN: 0029-2001


  2 in total

1.  The impact of an intervention programme employing a hands-on technique to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears: interrupted time-series reanalysis.

Authors:  Atle Fretheim; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; John-Arne Røttingen; Liv Merete Reinar; Siri Vangen; Tom Tanbo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mette Østergaard Poulsen; Mia Lund Madsen; Anne-Cathrine Skriver-Møller; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.