Literature DB >> 22137760

Particulate vs. block bone grafts: three-dimensional changes in graft volume after reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla, a 2-year radiographic follow-up.

Amir Dasmah1, Andreas Thor, Annika Ekestubbe, Lars Sennerby, Lars Rasmusson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extensive alveolar bone resorption in the maxilla limits the possibility of successful placement and osseointegration of endosseous implants for future prosthetic rehabilitation. Autogenous bone from the iliac crest may be used as lateral onlays in the atrophic maxilla, both as block and particulate bone. To our knowledge, there is no three-dimensional 2-year follow-up study measuring the volumetric reduction of the augmented areas comparing particulate and block bone grafts.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to conduct a radiographic 2-year follow-up study, using computed tomographic (CT) images in order to evaluate and compare the extent of bone graft resorption in the frontal maxillae augmented by particulate (test) and block bone (control).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients treated with iliac bone grafts and oral implants in the maxilla were followed with CT examinations directly post grafting and after 2 years. RESULT: The volumetric changes after 6 months were extensive. Additionally, the changes in particulate bone tended to be larger after 2 years compared to block bone, using this protocol. However, the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The present follow-up study showed that there is radiographically complete integration and embedding of implants installed in grafted bone despite extensive initial graft resorption. There was no significant difference in the amount of volumetric reduction between particulate bone and block bone grafts.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137760     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  21 in total

1.  8-10 year follow-up survival of dental implants in maxillae with or without autogenous bone graft reconstruction.

Authors:  Paulo H de Moraes; Sergio Olate; Andrezza Lauria; Luciana Asprino; Márcio de Moraes; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 2.  How efficacious is the combination of substitute bone graft with autogenous bone graft in comparison with substitute bone graft alone in the horizontal bone gain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Meza-Mauricio; Camila-Pinheiro Furquim; Leonardo-Delfino Dos Reis; Marlon-Marx-Hilariano Maximiano; Gerardo Mendoza-Azpur; Francisco-Wilker-Mustafa-Gomes Muniz; Giulio Rasperini; Marcelo Faveri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

3.  A review of implant provision for hypodontia patients within a Scottish referral centre.

Authors:  B Burns; V Grieg; V Bissell; L Savarrio
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Two bone blocks sandwich technique for horizontal reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridge in anterior maxilla: A case report.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Xia; Yu-Feng Zhang; Bin Shi; Min Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Mandibular Reconstruction With Block Iliac Crest: An Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Camila Camarini; Guilherme Spagnol; Manuela Monteiro Pinotti; Alan Motta do Canto; Fernando Alves Maciel; Ronaldo Rodrigues de Freitas
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-17

6.  Reconstruction of alveolar bone defect with autogenous bone particles and osseointegrated implants: Histologic analysis and 10 years monitoring.

Authors:  Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Mariliza Comar Astolphi de Carvalho; Daniela Ponzoni
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

7.  Retrospective long-term analysis of bone level changes after horizontal alveolar crest reconstruction with autologous bone grafts harvested from the posterior region of the mandible.

Authors:  Jan Oliver Voss; Tobias Dieke; Christian Doll; Claudia Sachse; Katja Nelson; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Susanne Nahles
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Evaluation of the autogenous bone block transfer for dental implant placement: Symphysal or ramus harvesting?

Authors:  Selim Ersanli; Volkan Arısan; Elçin Bedeloğlu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction analysis.

Authors:  Hyeong-Geun Lee; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  Three-Dimensional Assessment of Volumetric Changes in Sinuses Augmented with Two Different Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  B Alper Gultekin; Oguz Borahan; Ali Sirali; Z Cuneyt Karabuda; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.