Literature DB >> 22137515

Cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible optical scopes for tracheal intubation: a descriptive comparative study of reusable and single-use scopes.

Deepak Gupta1, Hong Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the costs per intubation of reusable fiberoptic scopes versus single-use intubation scopes.
DESIGN: Open-label retrospective study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The one-year intubation records of intubations performed with reusable intubation scopes, the one-year maintenance costs of these scopes, and their three-year repair cost records were analyzed. A total of 166 intubations were performed with reusable fiberoptic scopes in 2009. Calculations to assess the costs per intubation based on the documented records at our institution were made. The total cost of an intubation, the repair-to-intubation ratio, and the repair cost per intubation were determined. MAIN
RESULTS: The total cost of an intubation at our institution in 2009, using reusable scopes, was $119.75 [US dollars (USD)], which included $20.15 (purchasing), $53.48 (repair), $33.16 (maintenance), and $12.96 (labor). The repair-to-intubation ratio was 1:55. Repair costs were $53.48 per intubation and $2,959.44 per instance of repair.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ambu aScope, a single-use intubation scope, is a new addition to video laryngoscopy. The price should range within 10% of our intubation cost ($120.00 to $132.00 per single-use intubation scope).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137515     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  10 in total

1.  The Cost of Flexible Bronchoscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carina Østervig Andersen; Helena Travis; Emilie Dehlholm-Lambertsen; Rasmus Russell; Emmelie Ploug Jørgensen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Reduced turnover times make flexible optical reusable scope with EndoSheath(®) Technology significantly cost-effective.

Authors:  Deepak Gupta; Arvind Srirajakalidindi; Hong Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2012-07-08

3.  Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU.

Authors:  S Perbet; M Blanquet; C Mourgues; J Delmas; S Bertran; B Longère; V Boïko-Alaux; P Chennell; J-E Bazin; J-M Constantin
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Early Assessment of the Likely Cost Effectiveness of Single-Use Flexible Video Bronchoscopes.

Authors:  Christoffer Lilja Terjesen; Julia Kovaleva; Lars Ehlers
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-06

5.  Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries.

Authors:  Rhodri Saunders; Jason A Davis; Peter Kranke; Rachel Weissbrod; David K Whitaker; Jenifer R Lightdale
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia Jiang; Da-Xu Ma; Bo Li; An-Shi Wu; Fu-Shan Xue
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing the VivaSight Double-Lumen Tube and a Conventional Double-Lumen Tube in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery Involving One-Lung Ventilation.

Authors:  Sara Larsen; Jimmy Højberg Holm; Tove Nørgaard Sauer; Claus Andersen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-03

8.  A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes.

Authors:  J M Mouritsen; L Ehlers; J Kovaleva; I Ahmad; K El-Boghdadly
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Implementation of an Anaesthesia Quality Improvement Programme to Reduce Fibreoptic Bronchoscope Repair Incidents.

Authors:  Hsiao-Feng Lu; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Min-Hsien Chiang; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang; Sheng-Dean Luo; Jo-Chi Chin; Chih-Hsien Wang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Shao-Chun Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Reusable vs disposable nasopharyngolaryngoscopes: Cost analysis and resident survey.

Authors:  Ryan Walczak; Mark Arnold; Jeewanjot Grewal; Xiao Yuan; Amar Suryadevara; Haidy Marzouk
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.