Literature DB >> 22137510

Standard clinical risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy are not independent predictors of intubation success with the GlideScope.

José L Díaz-Gómez1, Anand Satyapriya, Sree V Satyapriya, Edward J Mascha, Dongsheng Yang, Paul Krakovitz, Emad B Mossad, Matthias Eikermann, D John Doyle.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the first-attempt tracheal intubation incidence using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope is higher in patients with predicted increased risk of difficult laryngoscopy, and to assess the ability of other a priori defined standard risk factors to predict first-attempt intubation success, in aggregate and by forming scores.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Operating room in a tertiary-care academic center. PATIENTS: 357 patients intubated with the GlideScope for nonemergent general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Mallampati airway class was used to create two groups of patients, one with higher and the other, lower, potential difficult laryngoscopy (Mallampati classes 3-4 and 1-2, respectively). Intubation success on the first attempt with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in patients with a Mallampati class 3 or 4 airway versus those with Mallampati class 1 or 2 airway was tested. We also evaluated the predictive ability of the Mallampati airway class (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4) along with 9 other possible predictors of difficult intubation on first-attempt intubation success: gender, age, body mass index, level of training within our anesthesia residency program (Clinical Anesthesia Resident years 1, 2, and 3), ASA physical status, mouth opening, thyromental distance, neck flexion, and neck extension. MAIN
RESULTS: None of the standard predictors of difficult intubation was significantly associated with outcome after adjusting for other predictors. A multivariable model containing the aggregate set of variables predicted outcome significantly better than a risk score formed as the sum of 10 predictors ("Risk 10"; P = 0.0176).
CONCLUSIONS: With GlideScope-assisted tracheal intubation, Mallampati airway class is not an independent risk factor for difficult intubation. Other standard clinical risk factors of difficulty with direct laryngoscopy also do not appear to be individually predictive of first-attempt success of tracheal intubation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137510     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  3 in total

1.  Creation of an artificial intelligence model for intubation difficulty classification by deep learning (convolutional neural network) using face images: an observational study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hayasaka; Kazuharu Kawano; Kazuki Kurihara; Hiroto Suzuki; Masaki Nakane; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-05-06

2.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; George Kovacs; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; Philip M Jones
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Validation of modified Mallampati test with addition of thyromental distance and sternomental distance to predict difficult endotracheal intubation in adults.

Authors:  Bhavdip Patel; Rajiv Khandekar; Rashesh Diwan; Ashok Shah
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.