Literature DB >> 22137142

Robotic telepresence: a helpful adjunct that is viewed favorably by critically ill surgical patients.

Joseph F Sucher1, S Rob Todd, Stephen L Jones, Terry Throckmorton, Krista L Turner, Frederick A Moore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess how surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients and their families would perceive robotic telepresence. We hypothesized that they would view such technology positively.
METHODS: This research was an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective observational study. Our robotic telepresence program augmented the SICU multidisciplinary team rounding process. We anonymously surveyed patients and their families on their perceptions. Those who interacted at least once with the robot served as our participant base.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients and 26 family members completed the survey. Ninety-two percent of respondents were comfortable with the robot, and 84% believed communication was "easy." Ninety percent did not perceive the robot as "annoying" and 92% did not believe that "the doctor cared less about them" because of the robot. Ninety-two percent of respondents supported the continued use of the robot.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic telepresence was viewed positively by patients and their families in the SICU. Furthermore, they believed the robot was beneficial to their care and indicated their support for its continued use.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137142     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  The effect of robotic telerounding in the surgical intensive care units impact on medical education.

Authors:  Corrado Paolo Marini; Garry Ritter; Cordelia Sharma; John McNelis; Michael Goldberg; Rafael Barrera
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-08

Review 2.  Mobile remote-presence devices for point-of-care health care delivery.

Authors:  Ivar Mendez; Michiel C Van den Hof
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Rural and remote care: Overcoming the challenges of distance.

Authors:  Donna Goodridge; Darcy Marciniuk
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 2.444

4.  Telerounding: A scoping review and implications for future healthcare practice.

Authors:  Andrew C Griggs; Crystal M Fausett; Richard J Simonson; Kimberly N Williams; Tiffany M Bisbey; Elizabeth H Lazzara; Joseph R Keebler; Deborah DiazGranados; Vimal K Mishra; Eric J Thomas; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  Hum Factors Healthc       Date:  2022-04-08

5.  Use of Robots in Critical Care: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Teng; Yichen Ding; Kay Choong See
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 6.  Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci; Alec C Beekley
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

7.  Expectations and Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals for Robot Deployment in Hospital Environments During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sergio D Sierra Marín; Daniel Gomez-Vargas; Nathalia Céspedes; Marcela Múnera; Flavio Roberti; Patricio Barria; Subramanian Ramamoorthy; Marcelo Becker; Ricardo Carelli; Carlos A Cifuentes
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-06-02

8.  The use of remote presence for health care delivery in a northern Inuit community: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ivar Mendez; Michael Jong; Debra Keays-White; Gail Turner
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.