Literature DB >> 22136977

Characteristics of successful recruitment in prospective pediatric pharmacogenetic studies.

Shannon N Saldaña1, David K Hooper, Tanya E Froehlich, Kathleen M Campbell, Cynthia A Prows, Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, Todd G Nick, Michael Seid, Alexander A Vinks, Tracy A Glauser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need to explore feasible means of accruing an appropriate study cohort to help fill the knowledge gap between pharmacogenetic contributions to drug response and clinical application in the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify factors affecting recruitment of eligible subjects in pharmacogenetic studies at a large Midwestern pediatric academic medical center. The objectives were to evaluate recruitment success of ongoing trials and ascertain contributors to differential recruitment rates. We hypothesized that studies with good recruitment of eligible subjects would share characteristics not present in studies with lower than anticipated recruitment. The goal was to better understand barriers to good recruitment in pharmacogenetic studies to help inform future trial and infrastructure design.
METHODS: Investigators designed a survey with proposed elements of success, which was then completed by lead and/or site investigators of all pharmacogenetics studies at the institution. Results were evaluated using an investigator-developed likelihood of success scoring system.
RESULTS: Two studies recruited >95% of the approached eligible patients; 4 studies were consistent with investigator-anticipated recruitment (>50%), and 1 study did not meet expected recruitment. A study's total score on the investigator-devised scoring tool correlated well with the proportion of approached patients recruited (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.82; P < 0.001). Multiple factors impacted successful recruitment into these pharmacogenetic studies. Features of studies with successful recruitment included standardized clinical care, an ongoing team-patient relationship, severe and/or life-threatening outcome measures, study coordinator with experience in clinical research, a study medication with few or no alternative treatment options, and active involvement of the research team in clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system for study characteristics may be useful to calculate the risk of failure for successful recruitment, allow discrimination among characteristics contributing to the risk, and permit study design alterations to improve likelihood of successful recruitment in pediatric pharmacogenetic studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136977      PMCID: PMC3319746          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  40 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  J M Campistol; S H Sacks
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  The genetic polymorphism of drug transporters: functional analysis approaches.

Authors:  Toshihisa Ishikawa; Akira Tsuji; Kenichi Inui; Yoshimichi Sai; Naohiko Anzai; Morimasa Wada; Hitoshi Endou; Yasuhiro Sumino
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparative study of ethosuximide and sodium valproate in the treatment of typical absence seizures (petit mal).

Authors:  N Callaghan; J O'Hare; D O'Driscoll; B O'Neill; M Daly
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Analysis of transforming growth factor-beta and profibrogenic molecules in a rat cardiac allograft model treated with cyclosporine.

Authors:  Ashwani K Khanna; Jessica S Hosenpud; Matthew S Plummer; Jeffrey D Hosenpud
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Clinical practice guideline: treatment of the school-aged child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Cross-sectional analysis of the influence of currently known pharmacogenetic modulators on opioid therapy in outpatient pain centers.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Nils von Hentig; Rainer Freynhagen; Norbert Griessinger; Michael Zimmermann; Alexandra Doehring; Maren Rohrbacher; Reinhard Sittl; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction and the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Greg A Knoll; Ian MacDonald; Asmat Khan; Carl Van Walraven
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  Management of children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Scott M Myers; Chris Plauché Johnson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Clinical Research Recruitment in a Pediatric Academic Medical Center--A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Erica Rose Denhoff; Carly E Milliren; Sarah D de Ferranti; Sarah K Steltz; Stavroula K Osganian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.