Literature DB >> 22136515

In vitro evaluation of cellular response induced by manufactured nanoparticles.

Masanori Horie1, Haruhisa Kato, Katsuhide Fujita, Shigehisa Endoh, Hitoshi Iwahashi.   

Abstract

"Nanoparticle" is defined as the particles whose diameter in at least one dimension is less than 100 nm. Compared with fine-particles, nanoparticles have large specific surface area. There is a dramatic increase over fine-particles in chemical and physical activities, such as ion release, adsorption ability, and ROS production. These properties are important for industrial use, and many nanoparticles are already used in products familiar to consumers as sunscreens and cosmetics. However, nanoparticle properties beneficial to the industry may also induce biological influences, including toxic activities. Recently, many investigations about the toxicology of nanoparticles have been reported. In the evaluation of nanoparticles toxicity, in vitro studies give us important information, especially in terms of toxic mechanisms. In vitro studies showed that some nanoparticles induce oxidative stress, apoptosis, production of cytokines, and cell death. There are reports that cellular influences of other nanoparticles are small. There are also reports of different results, some with low and some with high influences, for the same nanoparticle. One of the causes of this inconsistency might be a diremption of the living body influence study and the characterization study. Characterization of individual nanoparticles and their dispersions are essential for in vitro evaluation of their biological effects since each nanoparticle shows unique chemical and physical properties. Particularly, the aggregation state and metal ion release ability of nanoparticles affect its cellular influences. Reports concerning the characterization in the in vitro toxicity assessment are increasing. For an accurate risk assessment of nanoparticles, in this review, we outline recent studies of in vitro evaluation of cellular influences induced by nanoparticles. Moreover, we also introduce current studies about the characterization methods of nanoparticles and their dispersions for toxicological evaluation.
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136515     DOI: 10.1021/tx200470e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  31 in total

1.  Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver, and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model.

Authors:  Vivek A Miyani; Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.820

2.  The study of mechanisms of biological activity of copper oxide nanoparticle CuO in the test for seedling roots of Triticum vulgare.

Authors:  Anastasia Mickhailovna Korotkova; Svyatoslav Valeryevich Lebedev; Irina Aleksandrovna Gavrish
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on intestinal serotonin in zebrafish.

Authors:  Rıfat Emrah Ozel; Akhtar Hayat; Kenneth N Wallace; Silvana Andreescu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  The hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and the testicular function are modulated after silver nanoparticle exposure.

Authors:  M D Cavallin; R Wilk; I M Oliveira; N C S Cardoso; N M Khalil; C A Oliveira; M A Romano; R M Romano
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Mitochondrial impairment and oxidative stress mediated apoptosis induced by α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Song Zhu; Fei Luo; Bin Zhu; Gao-Xue Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Intracellular accumulation of indium ions released from nanoparticles induces oxidative stress, proinflammatory response and DNA damage.

Authors:  Yosuke Tabei; Akinari Sonoda; Yoshihiro Nakajima; Vasudevanpillai Biju; Yoji Makita; Yasukazu Yoshida; Masanori Horie
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Molecular responses of mouse macrophages to copper and copper oxide nanoparticles inferred from proteomic analyses.

Authors:  Sarah Triboulet; Catherine Aude-Garcia; Marie Carrière; Hélène Diemer; Fabienne Proamer; Aurélie Habert; Mireille Chevallet; Véronique Collin-Faure; Jean-Marc Strub; Daniel Hanau; Alain Van Dorsselaer; Nathalie Herlin-Boime; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Near-infrared excitation/emission microscopy with lanthanide-based nanoparticles.

Authors:  Laura Francés-Soriano; Juan Ferrera-González; María González-Béjar; Julia Pérez-Prieto
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays.

Authors:  Amara L Holder; Regine Goth-Goldstein; Donald Lucas; Catherine P Koshland
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Engineered metal oxide nanomaterials inhibit corneal epithelial wound healing in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Soohyun Kim; Brooke Gates; Brian C Leonard; Megan Gragg; Kent E Pinkerton; Laura Van Winkle; Christopher J Murphy; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Zhenyuan Zhang; Philip Demokritou; Sara M Thomasy
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2019-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.