Literature DB >> 22135196

Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review.

C Khalid-de Bakker1, D Jonkers, K Smits, I Mesters, A Masclee, R Stockbrügger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is implemented by an increasing number of countries. Participation rates of screening programs influence the health benefit and cost-effectiveness of the applied method. The aim was to systematically review participation rate after first-time invitation for CRC screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and/or computed tomography (CT) colonography.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed prior to October 1 2009. Prospective CRC screening studies of unselected populations reporting participation rates were included.
RESULTS: After meta-analyses, overall participation rates were found to be 47 % for FOBT, 42 % for fecal immunologic tests (FITs), 35 % for sigmoidoscopy, 41 % for sigmoidoscopy combined with FIT/FOBT, 28 % for colonoscopy, and 22 % for CT colonography. Studies comparing screening methods showed higher participation rates for less invasive methods. Studies comparing invitation methods showed higher participation rates with general practitioner involvement, a more personalized recruitment approach, and reduction of barriers that discourage participation.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of identified factors affecting CRC screening participation can be used to improve screening programs. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22135196     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  30 in total

1.  Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Sharon Fuller; Sharon S Laing; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Multifaceted Outreach to Initiate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shira N Goldman; David T Liss; Tiffany Brown; Ji Young Lee; David R Buchanan; Kate Balsley; Ana Cesan; Jordan Weil; Bridget H Garrity; David W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Camden Bay; Yinghui Xu; Jeanette M Daly; George Bergus; Jeffrey Dunkelberg; Carol Moss
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  S Wortley; G Wong; A Kieu; K Howard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of interleukin-8 in colorectal cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Jin; Jin-Ming Xu; Wen-Li Xu; Dong-Hua Gu; Pei-Wei Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.

Authors:  Alice Le Bonniec; Sophie Sun; Amandine Andrin; Alexandra L Dima; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  Providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to colorectal cancer control in Brazil.

Authors:  Douglas M Puricelli Perin; Mona Saraiya; Trevor D Thompson; Lenildo de Moura; Eduardo J Simoes; Diana C Parra; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Comparison of the participation rate between CT colonography and colonoscopy in screening population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  He Zhu; Fudong Li; Ke Tao; Jing Wang; Carissa Scurlock; Xiaofei Zhang; Hong Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 10.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.