Literature DB >> 22135107

Learning new vocabulary in German: the effects of inferring word meanings, type of feedback, and time of test.

Shana K Carpenter1, Riebana E Sachs, Beth Martin, Kristian Schmidt, Ruxandra Looft.   

Abstract

In the present study, introductory-level German students read a simplified story and learned the meanings of new German words by reading English translations in marginal glosses versus trying to infer (i.e., guess) their translations. Students who inferred translations were given feedback in English or in German, or no feedback at all. Although immediate retention of new vocabulary was better for students who used marginal glosses, students who inferred word meanings and then received English feedback forgot fewer translations over time. Plausible but inaccurate inferences (i.e., those that made sense in the context) were more likely to be corrected by students who received English feedback as compared with German feedback, providing support for the beneficial effects of mediating information. Implausible inaccurate inferences, however, were more likely to be corrected on the delayed vocabulary test by students who received German feedback as compared with English feedback, possibly because of the additional contextual support provided by German feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22135107     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0185-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Teaching machines; from the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self instruction.

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?

Authors:  Kalif E Vaughn; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.

Authors:  Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

3.  Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: the role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit.

Authors:  Kellie M Mullaney; Shana K Carpenter; Courtney Grotenhuis; Steven Burianek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

Review 4.  How relevant is social interaction in second language learning?

Authors:  Laura Verga; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Vocabulary Learning During Reading: Benefits of Contextual Inferences Versus Retrieval Opportunities.

Authors:  Gesa S E van den Broek; Eva Wesseling; Linske Huijssen; Maj Lettink; Tamara van Gog
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

6.  Prequestions do not enhance the benefits of retrieval in a STEM classroom.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Shana K Carpenter; Monica H Lamm; Shuhebur Rahman; Patrick I Armstrong; Clark R Coffman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-10-25

7.  Optimizing the Efficacy of Learning Objectives through Pretests.

Authors:  Faria Sana; Noah D Forrin; Mrinalini Sharma; Tamara Dubljevic; Peter Ho; Ezza Jalil; Joseph A Kim
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.